From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E35DF5EE91; Sat, 3 Feb 2024 15:05:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706972755; cv=none; b=Ul5yu8wDsMPehjmBpyWqfzWwWn0dEtlUAG0MsyJe6b72SuB+fzGhQ9Xqb/AsNXVP5eg2HCc7TnyQQScj1rhYumijppqUbVVUhaC7rNeV2ZAOFqRJg0u3MYguzDco5YaaW51zRwWwOFbki77uDtjOhI+OIJI8EBwWtGVvhdr6A9s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706972755; c=relaxed/simple; bh=oN2Jtenyl16AJ73ZWHV33yxPWdeYESnQPTWfOUZIMcQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=JRwHaSAXMr86VfrTfulpX7CjvxTrKDCARV0ni5IM8SeA7+9nBL5aSXL74/YOcuX8T4RjkgD4IxKgY7H1wt14+9a+mKk/6z3i4WZx9SOFnO6bLdHCObk5hyq4hTBRPKeHlz0KT6AJoJGv6opTjr+YCfJUGnIqyprl0Z/o1lWzAXk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=NVlBS4bu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="NVlBS4bu" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1706972754; x=1738508754; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=oN2Jtenyl16AJ73ZWHV33yxPWdeYESnQPTWfOUZIMcQ=; b=NVlBS4buvGuM/8vDVk2ApmXbo1i1WRUofwAPo3Cnh4w+QXa/auzKuEXL oSJ3hQoFnJKPuJX6wcXU+9hZIEvDWJMpKHzNuHAmQtr43HtRCcoeAHO21 LVc5NdlgrJ51mNE312IPKw8Zz9UPlJBqAano/Ut1ZrtIJNG6jpdST0oXW PrhZXAL6p/1IO27L51am9N4Upxsqz2xGtQC8T3s/lLm1hXzppKgFRNZ+K Ou2TYTnnNcdikQbmTh4FaPjG5hthHZZ/G36YWQayWU/RCrcQiUbxzDF0O RsFxPpO98NKFogZRB07+5PNztoSflK9XD3C3fcFELl2TJSsrcHxwaVbAh w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10973"; a="555412" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,240,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="555412" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by fmvoesa110.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Feb 2024 07:05:53 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.05,240,1701158400"; d="scan'208";a="23607843" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 59f4f4cd5935) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmviesa002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Feb 2024 07:05:51 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 59f4f4cd5935 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rWHaV-0005DG-10; Sat, 03 Feb 2024 15:05:48 +0000 Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2024 23:04:49 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Fiona Klute , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Ping-Ke Shih Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Kalle Valo , Ulf Hansson , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek , =?utf-8?Q?Ond=C5=99ej?= Jirman , Fiona Klute Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] wifi: rtw88: Shared module for rtw8723x devices Message-ID: <202402032249.cMZd6DxM-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240202121050.977223-2-fiona.klute@gmx.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240202121050.977223-2-fiona.klute@gmx.de> Hi Fiona, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on wireless-next/main] [also build test WARNING on wireless/main linus/master v6.8-rc2 next-20240202] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Fiona-Klute/wifi-rtw88-Shared-module-for-rtw8723x-devices/20240202-201428 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wireless/wireless-next.git main patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240202121050.977223-2-fiona.klute%40gmx.de patch subject: [PATCH 1/9] wifi: rtw88: Shared module for rtw8723x devices config: parisc-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240203/202402032249.cMZd6DxM-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: hppa-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240203/202402032249.cMZd6DxM-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202402032249.cMZd6DxM-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723x.c:156:6: warning: no previous prototype for '__rtw8723x_cfg_ldo25' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 156 | void __rtw8723x_cfg_ldo25(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, bool enable) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/__rtw8723x_cfg_ldo25 +156 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/rtw8723x.c 155 > 156 void __rtw8723x_cfg_ldo25(struct rtw_dev *rtwdev, bool enable) 157 { 158 u8 ldo_pwr; 159 160 ldo_pwr = rtw_read8(rtwdev, REG_LDO_EFUSE_CTRL + 3); 161 if (enable) { 162 ldo_pwr &= ~BIT_MASK_LDO25_VOLTAGE; 163 ldo_pwr |= (BIT_LDO25_VOLTAGE_V25 << 4) | BIT_LDO25_EN; 164 } else { 165 ldo_pwr &= ~BIT_LDO25_EN; 166 } 167 rtw_write8(rtwdev, REG_LDO_EFUSE_CTRL + 3, ldo_pwr); 168 } 169 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki