From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2][next] wifi: wil6210: wmi: Use __counted_by() in struct wmi_set_link_monitor_cmd and avoid -Wfamnae warning
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:10:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202404291008.51DB333F@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <171222554691.1806092.8730005090791383928.kvalo@kernel.org>
On Thu, Apr 04, 2024 at 10:12:28AM +0000, Kalle Valo wrote:
> "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> > Prepare for the coming implementation by GCC and Clang of the
> > __counted_by attribute. Flexible array members annotated with
> > __counted_by can have their accesses bounds-checked at run-time
> > via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE
> > (for strcpy/memcpy-family functions).
> >
> > Also, -Wflex-array-member-not-at-end is coming in GCC-14, and we are
> > getting ready to enable it globally.
> >
> > So, use the `DEFINE_FLEX()` helper for an on-stack definition of
> > a flexible structure where the size of the flexible-array member
> > is known at compile-time, and refactor the rest of the code,
> > accordingly.
> >
> > So, with these changes, fix the following warning:
> > drivers/net/wireless/ath/wil6210/wmi.c:4018:49: warning: structure containing a flexible array member is not at the end of another structure [-Wflex-array-member-not-at-end]
> >
> > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/202
> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Jeff Johnson <quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <quic_kvalo@quicinc.com>
>
> Patch applied to ath-next branch of ath.git, thanks.
>
> cbb0697e0ded wifi: wil6210: wmi: Use __counted_by() in struct wmi_set_link_monitor_cmd and avoid -Wfamnae warning
Hi,
I was just walking through our patch tracker and noticed that I don't
see this patch include in -next yet (as of next-20240429). Is there a
flush of the ath-next queue planned soon? Or did I miss some change?
Thanks!
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-29 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-27 21:43 [PATCH v2][next] wifi: wil6210: wmi: Use __counted_by() in struct wmi_set_link_monitor_cmd and avoid -Wfamnae warning Gustavo A. R. Silva
2024-03-27 21:57 ` Jeff Johnson
2024-04-04 10:12 ` Kalle Valo
2024-04-29 17:10 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2024-04-29 17:25 ` Kalle Valo
2024-04-29 18:09 ` Kees Cook
2024-04-29 19:21 ` Kalle Valo
2024-04-29 19:52 ` Kees Cook
2024-04-30 6:39 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202404291008.51DB333F@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_jjohnson@quicinc.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox