[PATCH 2/6] wifi: brcmfmac: use 'time_left' variable with wait_event_timeout()

[Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>]

There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
store the result of wait_event_timeout() causing patterns like:

	timeout = wait_event_timeout(...)
	if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;

with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
self explaining.

Fix to the proper variable type 'long' while here.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
---
 .../wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c    | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
index 5fe0e671ecb3..1585a5653ee4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/cfg80211.c
@@ -4071,7 +4071,7 @@ static void brcmf_report_wowl_wakeind(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct brcmf_if *ifp)
 	struct cfg80211_wowlan_wakeup *wakeup;
 	u32 wakeind;
 	s32 err;
-	int timeout;
+	long time_left;
 
 	err = brcmf_fil_iovar_data_get(ifp, "wowl_wakeind", &wake_ind_le,
 				       sizeof(wake_ind_le));
@@ -4113,10 +4113,10 @@ static void brcmf_report_wowl_wakeind(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct brcmf_if *ifp)
 		}
 		if (wakeind & BRCMF_WOWL_PFN_FOUND) {
 			brcmf_dbg(INFO, "WOWL Wake indicator: BRCMF_WOWL_PFN_FOUND\n");
-			timeout = wait_event_timeout(cfg->wowl.nd_data_wait,
-				cfg->wowl.nd_data_completed,
-				BRCMF_ND_INFO_TIMEOUT);
-			if (!timeout)
+			time_left = wait_event_timeout(cfg->wowl.nd_data_wait,
+						       cfg->wowl.nd_data_completed,
+						       BRCMF_ND_INFO_TIMEOUT);
+			if (!time_left)
 				bphy_err(drvr, "No result for wowl net detect\n");
 			else
 				wakeup_data.net_detect = cfg->wowl.nd_info;
-- 
2.43.0