From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail11.truemail.it (mail11.truemail.it [217.194.8.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32A6D25779; Tue, 16 Jul 2024 19:57:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721159858; cv=none; b=ltKTysPRnUUc9SlJ1BnxudLJv2/d6yWodDoYfvfMkvkLkiIwexsj1njhHSavp2T6De3KLfPUaCbr89XBWxOrzOHwjNevaAd0QdHiVFTTdHu6fGSM0zvi0GFpxJoyMobeAMI9gEhq82E3LGB6v7k6v4GAkk1FG0GZvLk2BcYqXnM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721159858; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uyFsz0E1NO096FvlJlYqMe4GqjWfZ+pUDQY8O06c4K8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=pfUUEpJiVndF3yRugbacfFqvgP9Fzw92KjI75ut0uKRxSsEevhTr/VDkp2f1Qac1fCxRsCixGbKQgcqk/byrRCDhwd+K6wkdQ2RZs3qobxy9OYSRNt/zPaL6xl8hU/GL59urhn/FqTnDjSJwBkGSJ0lmYTPMXJNO+d8giXR+c1M= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b=atFkNtaf; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.194.8.81 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=dolcini.it Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dolcini.it header.i=@dolcini.it header.b="atFkNtaf" Received: from francesco-nb (31-10-206-125.static.upc.ch [31.10.206.125]) by mail11.truemail.it (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E53C41F928; Tue, 16 Jul 2024 21:57:32 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dolcini.it; s=default; t=1721159853; bh=uyFsz0E1NO096FvlJlYqMe4GqjWfZ+pUDQY8O06c4K8=; h=From:To:Subject; b=atFkNtafYU1zXTAi8VPp5XWp40MmaHLTiYeASy6DJWQycqJ69onpmk67Owbc5xUBk +wx9dDgvjiP2JK81BcVh6W0Aobkb5Nqnl+xkJ72KouD/GCU/2UecG9G3Rr87SRI1DU HXGxLujQcLUMCLNsnUM0xp0hKR6CtbG86ikDkotlIyrutu+QPgjKCoHI0rYDflAdWk uFQG0nNq5mKGjVDpiZ7Xr4ysHBYpazVNcdethbsEOFd+YTqknjiH8sIGrYFq9vt/qx FAxfRQ3uO81Dlhg6NHvxuFDAgWlDxGhW/V0O56246+R8vQycGmzaNWrwrEhIyG5azn GSa1aZLMbrLJg== Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2024 21:57:31 +0200 From: Francesco Dolcini To: Sascha Hauer Cc: Brian Norris , Francesco Dolcini , Kalle Valo , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] wifi: mwifiex: add support for WPA-PSK-SHA256 Message-ID: <20240716195731.GB85916@francesco-nb> References: <20240716-mwifiex-wpa-psk-sha256-v1-0-05ae70f37bb3@pengutronix.de> <20240716-mwifiex-wpa-psk-sha256-v1-2-05ae70f37bb3@pengutronix.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240716-mwifiex-wpa-psk-sha256-v1-2-05ae70f37bb3@pengutronix.de> Hello Sascha, On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 01:33:28PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > This adds support for the WPA-PSK AKM suite with SHA256 as hashing > method (WPA-PSK-SHA256). Tested with a wpa_supplicant provided AP > using key_mgmt=WPA-PSK-SHA256. Do you have any more details on which chip/firmware you tested? The change looks good, I am just wondering if there are reasons this might create issue on some specific chip/firmware combination. Francesco