From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.avm.de (mail.avm.de [212.42.244.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 388E417565; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 04:55:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.42.244.120 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721883307; cv=none; b=f15Zd8SzOUsE6sCw+pJ+LqMqEgaMDR9Et0OevTiOIIrZsQ6D6WiqoMf6TCPZFQeRzJD2/45sgf84sx2gtD2+0hr+sOb+ZazqARmYsm93ATocXYcVOZsL5272wzpVzBba65GP57Rxvzk9TLc3XGITxKlAmvA5msvQ4RfDqtdZNgs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1721883307; c=relaxed/simple; bh=1b7IngO0nwhRuFvE2bz2TnqMfK9MlvsriuEpIKDmME8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=tAiH4z6Ad09mGv/baMS3qfW+7Ar5B9XEMXCtPu7zowLb+O8EOafxkSqRVJCUrWv4djbVKAPN2768VJjXvqM49FEHkTxeD/mBkGhVn2LTWMXIHziex/zBBzK+lcYFAwHbK1VDIyOUfEeN9ftxyT6Anq27OrK4AgP79Y2xdhWFInY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=avm.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=avm.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=avm.de header.i=@avm.de header.b=AW56FVoi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=212.42.244.120 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=avm.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=avm.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=avm.de header.i=@avm.de header.b="AW56FVoi" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=avm.de; s=mail; t=1721882893; bh=1b7IngO0nwhRuFvE2bz2TnqMfK9MlvsriuEpIKDmME8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=AW56FVoiMFQI7NZdf7NyRNjl+svP8U6sDkonqHDyckp40y+jNf+ErPhSkMwy8AEel DzdirLTXqEHdYScRuQqAOpn4j1SYdktfTRtkCPy7VnIr0D+iQz0JhH4Dv2bS07a4Fj G2OrkmwuKeS80xHT17GSZscBPHdsEWvYVZ/L14x0= Received: from mail-auth.avm.de (dovecot-mx-01.avm.de [212.42.244.71]) by mail.avm.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 06:48:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from buildd.core.avm.de (buildd-sv-01.avm.de [172.16.0.225]) by mail-auth.avm.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0325480023; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 06:48:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by buildd.core.avm.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E8A5F181BCF; Thu, 25 Jul 2024 06:48:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2024 06:48:12 +0200 From: Nicolas Schier To: Julian Sun Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, brauner@kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, masahiroy@kernel.org, ojeda@kernel.org, djwong@kernel.org, kvalo@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: add macro_checker script to check unused parameters in macros Message-ID: <20240725-interesting-annoying-mammoth-6bb3ef@buildd> References: <20240723091154.52458-1-sunjunchao2870@gmail.com> <20240723150931.42f206f9cd86bc391b48c790@linux-foundation.org> <20240724194313.01cfc493b253cbe1626ec563@linux-foundation.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-purgate-ID: 149429::1721882892-97E5D4D6-E06623CF/0/0 X-purgate-type: clean X-purgate-size: 1070 X-purgate-Ad: Categorized by eleven eXpurgate (R) http://www.eleven.de X-purgate: This mail is considered clean (visit http://www.eleven.de for further information) X-purgate: clean On Wed, Jul 24, 2024 at 11:05:43PM -0400, Julian Sun wrote: > Andrew Morton 于2024年7月24日周三 22:43写道： > > > > On Wed, 24 Jul 2024 22:30:49 -0400 Julian Sun wrote: > > > > > I noticed that you have already merged this patch into the > > > mm-nonmm-unstable branch. > > > > Yup. If a patch looks desirable (and reasonably close to ready) I'll > > grab it to give it some exposure and testing while it's under > > development, To help things along and to hopefully arrive at a batter > > end result. > > > > > If I want to continue refining this script, > > > should I send a new v2 version or make modifications based on the > > > current version? > > > > > > > Either is OK - whatever makes most sense for the reviewers. Reissuing > > > a large patch series for a single line change is counterproductive ;) > Thanks for your clarification. I will send a new patch based on the > current version. Hi Julian, can you please Cc linux-kbuild in v2? Kind regards, Nicolas