From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3F6621A3AB6 for ; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 08:26:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725351962; cv=none; b=J/a6OKOCdnEjnj7k7Sfw0jIYsIAO+xp+VtIvqn83BFbgkgXQHr3wUOuRfrSlHzKPxGKpIJXTyiroTO8OcoBwqmw+rts4v3+qh/tloAiPTl8vXSrq3WxoSJ7JC8a2BOor/eVQ+5zJ/1F9BfHiGV24hBu8IfAfQkF6oafuRVvRu6s= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725351962; c=relaxed/simple; bh=vYhs8/OhOST+Ytk+PH5Ou11+qXdhvbZsTmHgou6PRrY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nt0pQhFJ77kDs0cO7M/h3Qx1KZL8GeiPmpw0/LHtSW1PoNq/z4taB8Wjw/Wrk0CfVI/2+aWh1QKuloHHeFjaPSnItlpggtUQTMm8yQwVcT/WfJk3Oou0TnbHzLUjkswk9IlfW/mq0RfWEB3COJD0NsQGqQo2npHPn7MTfyo8v0U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=qXnycKJE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qXnycKJE" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1715FC4CEC4; Tue, 3 Sep 2024 08:26:00 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1725351961; bh=vYhs8/OhOST+Ytk+PH5Ou11+qXdhvbZsTmHgou6PRrY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qXnycKJE3BOxa230PbKNP6TiCssUFn5Wje/hbbrdhpAnfKNlMQGCYHrm6ev83nTh8 FffEIL4d/aIUNayPCUxFXtjER70ZGkcdBxLwBRR5ftAA771fZUMxa/F6wH4CtDM6MF 6RQhyTSKWzqgAOFFsW9xXu+GmUe8PV7IyxZyv899NWWJc8ljs9NtNqm5pyBRguJt7/ BCbKeMIMOYOOKiYBtzBETZaDZ1sIiWgcu9OkCjmC1jaPhdFAd24tfFApcRV41VFPwg NTYEfat19SuRlXju87PIyDWUsji46ZPeHeLXybeWpq3G/Di3z2nFkN/z2LdIwuR21K oE2J1Uk0QW2NQ== Date: Tue, 3 Sep 2024 09:25:58 +0100 From: Simon Horman To: Johannes Berg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: cfg80211: wext: Correct spelling in iw_handler.h Message-ID: <20240903082558.GQ23170@kernel.org> References: <20240829-wifi-spell-v1-1-e0a8855482a9@kernel.org> <20240902090104.GA77312@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 11:11:11AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2024-09-02 at 10:01 +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > > > But is it worth it at all? This stuff is totally on the way out, so all > > > the thing about "proven a reasonably good design", well, didn't really > > > pan out in practice... > > > > I think if the text is there it may as well be correct. > > But if you prefer to leave it as is, then we can drop this topic. > > Sure, that's fair, I'm happy to apply patches updating the > grammar/spelling by itself. No need to go into full rewrite and/or > historic debates about the design :) Thanks, I agree. I have sent a v2, which addresses the grammar issue that you flagged. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-wireless/20240903-wifi-spell-v2-1-bfcf7062face@kernel.org/ I did look for other grammar issues on other lines that are already updated by that patch: you can get a laugh when you find something obvious. I didn't check any further, because this seems to be enough for now. But I can if you like.