From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55FE821505F for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 08:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733731427; cv=none; b=BxOWzzRwajZd7vDRLydI3LUmmCoElUZZHtC22+sV4XH2uA7a85bcMntIn4d03WytPPXU+323moHd6slYsP68AYhvlmG3xO5zJhTVfMd1LCEaQ0ksQry7IhrZkQriYonwXKaoOmmHOGnUO9Jj5ebAo9TWnoNgQyGMsLFkYCe0jtA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1733731427; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mV6ov3sFgpt7rgCC6Pvrp/3B/vFOn5GJ/ODx71pgw1c=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=J7oBZ2HkTkgIDSJTFWesNmZVoz2pRApW2Bvm/kwD92j6RlIokG8LLt/q4hHmuHByzKWxEnZSnJoFE2/4a+5VcBpTv6OtsmqMQnSP/4WiW6hkR3CgKuEZkR3PD5C3EqrJ37AtJMUI480R7+SpBZPLlmzJhVQ6pQ1mKilNbjIg8ag= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=eOS6csRl; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="eOS6csRl" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1733731424; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=mV6ov3sFgpt7rgCC6Pvrp/3B/vFOn5GJ/ODx71pgw1c=; b=eOS6csRlhu4yjKUW2ysVzBCxKkvRbmpeuJjM4lHhwZGS+YEznk+1SZklx8XwgdXmtfJmAE qbkLv9rUeW5XrJRiK0LW8+KV0WbQyUJ67W6YwjDAuqAPcUvmBBNMmDUBcBNmWImSILaNdD +OgvtmCcbfUzY/Av/kUEmsg+IImMSaU= Received: from mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (ec2-54-186-198-63.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com [54.186.198.63]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-269-TTUgGWDePXyyFS5-S_VJzQ-1; Mon, 09 Dec 2024 03:03:41 -0500 X-MC-Unique: TTUgGWDePXyyFS5-S_VJzQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: TTUgGWDePXyyFS5-S_VJzQ Received: from mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com [10.30.177.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mx-prod-mc-03.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 906811954B39; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 08:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fedora.redhat.com (unknown [10.39.192.253]) by mx-prod-int-04.mail-002.prod.us-west-2.aws.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB03195606C; Mon, 9 Dec 2024 08:03:35 +0000 (UTC) From: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez To: quic_yuzha@quicinc.com Cc: ath11k@lists.infradead.org, jjohnson@kernel.org, jtornosm@redhat.com, kvalo@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, quic_cjhuang@quicinc.com, vbenes@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: ath11k: allow APs combination when dual stations are supported Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 09:03:34 +0100 Message-ID: <20241209080334.5989-1-jtornosm@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <1123551c-1a6d-4d0d-b3c7-f65c15509280@quicinc.com> References: <1123551c-1a6d-4d0d-b3c7-f65c15509280@quicinc.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.0 on 10.30.177.40 > So you can't up with ap type or can't up with managed interface? Please, let's go to focus and not repeat the same, due to the reasons that I commented before, I can't up my scenario with aps using your proposed inteface configuration. I am going to remark again, I can do it with the old configuration previous to the commit f019f4dff2e4 ("wifi: ath11k: support 2 station interfaces"). Thanks to my patch after 019f4dff2e4 ("wifi: ath11k: support 2 station interfaces") by means of a parameter I can do it too. And that's all. Thanks Best regards Jose Ignacio