From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] wifi: rtw89: fw: add blacklist to avoid obsolete secure firmware
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 14:43:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250217064308.43559-2-pkshih@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250217064308.43559-1-pkshih@realtek.com>
To ensure secure chip only runs expected secure firmware, stop using
obsolete firmware in blacklist which weakness or flaw was found.
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h | 2 +
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.h | 12 +++++
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8851b.c | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852b.c | 1 +
.../net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt.c | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c.c | 1 +
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8922a.c | 1 +
9 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
index b3fdd8eded21..5044d78435b8 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ struct rtw89_dev;
struct rtw89_pci_info;
struct rtw89_mac_gen_def;
struct rtw89_phy_gen_def;
+struct rtw89_fw_blacklist;
struct rtw89_efuse_block_cfg;
struct rtw89_h2c_rf_tssi;
struct rtw89_fw_txpwr_track_cfg;
@@ -4257,6 +4258,7 @@ struct rtw89_chip_info {
bool try_ce_fw;
u8 bbmcu_nr;
u32 needed_fw_elms;
+ const struct rtw89_fw_blacklist *fw_blacklist;
u32 fifo_size;
bool small_fifo_size;
u32 dle_scc_rsvd_size;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
index 35b86970db2a..17f80f1f23df 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c
@@ -38,6 +38,16 @@ struct rtw89_arp_rsp {
static const u8 mss_signature[] = {0x4D, 0x53, 0x53, 0x4B, 0x50, 0x4F, 0x4F, 0x4C};
+const struct rtw89_fw_blacklist rtw89_fw_blacklist_default = {
+ .ver = 0x00,
+ .list = {0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0,
+ 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0,
+ 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0,
+ 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0,
+ },
+};
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rtw89_fw_blacklist_default);
+
union rtw89_fw_element_arg {
size_t offset;
enum rtw89_rf_path rf_path;
@@ -344,6 +354,46 @@ static int __parse_formatted_mssc(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
return 0;
}
+static int __check_secure_blacklist(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
+ struct rtw89_fw_bin_info *info,
+ struct rtw89_fw_hdr_section_info *section_info,
+ const void *content)
+{
+ const struct rtw89_fw_blacklist *chip_blacklist = rtwdev->chip->fw_blacklist;
+ const union rtw89_fw_section_mssc_content *section_content = content;
+ struct rtw89_fw_secure *sec = &rtwdev->fw.sec;
+ u8 byte_idx;
+ u8 bit_mask;
+
+ if (!sec->secure_boot)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (!info->secure_section_exist || section_info->ignore)
+ return 0;
+
+ if (!chip_blacklist) {
+ rtw89_err(rtwdev, "chip no blacklist for secure firmware\n");
+ return -ENOENT;
+ }
+
+ byte_idx = section_content->blacklist.bit_in_chip_list >> 3;
+ bit_mask = BIT(section_content->blacklist.bit_in_chip_list & 0x7);
+
+ if (section_content->blacklist.ver > chip_blacklist->ver) {
+ rtw89_err(rtwdev, "chip blacklist out of date (%u, %u)\n",
+ section_content->blacklist.ver, chip_blacklist->ver);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (chip_blacklist->list[byte_idx] & bit_mask) {
+ rtw89_err(rtwdev, "firmware %u in chip blacklist\n",
+ section_content->blacklist.ver);
+ return -EPERM;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int __parse_security_section(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
struct rtw89_fw_bin_info *info,
struct rtw89_fw_hdr_section_info *section_info,
@@ -374,7 +424,7 @@ static int __parse_security_section(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
info->secure_section_exist = true;
}
- return 0;
+ return __check_secure_blacklist(rtwdev, info, section_info, content);
}
static int rtw89_fw_hdr_parser_v1(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, const u8 *fw, u32 len,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.h
index 994d109a9c3c..31d44513b181 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.h
@@ -663,6 +663,11 @@ struct rtw89_fw_mss_pool_hdr {
} __packed;
union rtw89_fw_section_mssc_content {
+ struct {
+ u8 pad[0x20];
+ u8 bit_in_chip_list;
+ u8 ver;
+ } __packed blacklist;
struct {
u8 pad[58];
__le32 v;
@@ -673,6 +678,13 @@ union rtw89_fw_section_mssc_content {
} __packed key_sign_len;
} __packed;
+struct rtw89_fw_blacklist {
+ u8 ver;
+ u8 list[32];
+};
+
+extern const struct rtw89_fw_blacklist rtw89_fw_blacklist_default;
+
static inline void SET_CTRL_INFO_MACID(void *table, u32 val)
{
le32p_replace_bits((__le32 *)(table) + 0, val, GENMASK(6, 0));
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8851b.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8851b.c
index 82289dbad1f4..8fba6413a5cb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8851b.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8851b.c
@@ -2458,6 +2458,7 @@ const struct rtw89_chip_info rtw8851b_chip_info = {
.try_ce_fw = true,
.bbmcu_nr = 0,
.needed_fw_elms = 0,
+ .fw_blacklist = NULL,
.fifo_size = 196608,
.small_fifo_size = true,
.dle_scc_rsvd_size = 98304,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c
index 2046832d021f..1b958c559aac 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852a.c
@@ -2175,6 +2175,7 @@ const struct rtw89_chip_info rtw8852a_chip_info = {
.try_ce_fw = false,
.bbmcu_nr = 0,
.needed_fw_elms = 0,
+ .fw_blacklist = NULL,
.fifo_size = 458752,
.small_fifo_size = false,
.dle_scc_rsvd_size = 0,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852b.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852b.c
index 652914a36245..780fc19d617f 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852b.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852b.c
@@ -811,6 +811,7 @@ const struct rtw89_chip_info rtw8852b_chip_info = {
.try_ce_fw = true,
.bbmcu_nr = 0,
.needed_fw_elms = 0,
+ .fw_blacklist = &rtw89_fw_blacklist_default,
.fifo_size = 196608,
.small_fifo_size = true,
.dle_scc_rsvd_size = 98304,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt.c
index 6f15245b2f74..1173496a075d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852bt.c
@@ -745,6 +745,7 @@ const struct rtw89_chip_info rtw8852bt_chip_info = {
.try_ce_fw = true,
.bbmcu_nr = 0,
.needed_fw_elms = RTW89_AX_GEN_DEF_NEEDED_FW_ELEMENTS_NO_6GHZ,
+ .fw_blacklist = &rtw89_fw_blacklist_default,
.fifo_size = 458752,
.small_fifo_size = true,
.dle_scc_rsvd_size = 98304,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c.c
index ecc1ff358583..c61e4953bc97 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c.c
@@ -2967,6 +2967,7 @@ const struct rtw89_chip_info rtw8852c_chip_info = {
.try_ce_fw = false,
.bbmcu_nr = 0,
.needed_fw_elms = 0,
+ .fw_blacklist = &rtw89_fw_blacklist_default,
.fifo_size = 458752,
.small_fifo_size = false,
.dle_scc_rsvd_size = 0,
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8922a.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8922a.c
index 898a65a721dc..da26ba22e7e6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8922a.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8922a.c
@@ -2728,6 +2728,7 @@ const struct rtw89_chip_info rtw8922a_chip_info = {
.try_ce_fw = false,
.bbmcu_nr = 1,
.needed_fw_elms = RTW89_BE_GEN_DEF_NEEDED_FW_ELEMENTS,
+ .fw_blacklist = &rtw89_fw_blacklist_default,
.fifo_size = 589824,
.small_fifo_size = false,
.dle_scc_rsvd_size = 0,
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-17 6:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-17 6:43 [PATCH 0/5] wifi: rtw89: fw: add firmware blacklist to avoid obsolete secure firmware Ping-Ke Shih
2025-02-17 6:43 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
2025-02-21 2:00 ` [PATCH 1/5] wifi: rtw89: fw: add " Ping-Ke Shih
2025-02-17 6:43 ` [PATCH 2/5] wifi: rtw89: fw: get sb_sel_ver via get_unaligned_le32() Ping-Ke Shih
2025-02-17 6:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] wifi: rtw89: fw: propagate error code from rtw89_h2c_tx() Ping-Ke Shih
2025-02-17 6:43 ` [PATCH 4/5] wifi: rtw89: fw: add debug message for unexpected secure firmware Ping-Ke Shih
2025-02-17 6:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] wifi: rtw89: fw: safely cast mfw_hdr pointer from firmware->data Ping-Ke Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250217064308.43559-2-pkshih@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).