From: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl>
To: Tuo Li <islituo@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] wifi: iwlegacy: 3945-rs: remove redundant pointer check in il3945_rs_tx_status() and il3945_rs_get_rate()
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 08:03:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260112070319.GA115711@wp.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260111171118.203249-1-islituo@gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 01:11:18AM +0800, Tuo Li wrote:
> The variable il_sta passed into these two functions cannot be NULL, so
> remove the related null checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tuo Li <islituo@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl>
Thanks
Stanislaw
> ---
> v4:
> * Remove the redundant NULL check instead of using WARN_ON_ONCE(), and
> update the subject accordingly.
> Thanks to Stanislaw Gruszka for helpful advice.
> v3:
> * Replace plain NULL check with WARN_ON_ONCE() and update subject to better
> reflect defensive nature of the check.
> Thanks to Johannes Berg and Stanislaw Gruszka for helpful advice.
> v2:
> * Return early for uninitialized STA il data and align D_RATE messages with
> il3945_rs_tx_status(). Add a wifi: prefix to the patch title.
> Thanks to Stanislaw Gruszka for the helpful advice.
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/3945-rs.c | 7 +------
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/3945-rs.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/3945-rs.c
> index 1826c37c090c..ecc6c8d2a4c5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/3945-rs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/3945-rs.c
> @@ -448,11 +448,6 @@ il3945_rs_tx_status(void *il_rate, struct ieee80211_supported_band *sband,
> return;
> }
>
> - if (!il_sta) {
> - D_RATE("leave: No STA il data to update!\n");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> /* Treat uninitialized rate scaling data same as non-existing. */
> if (!rs_sta->il) {
> D_RATE("leave: STA il data uninitialized!\n");
> @@ -627,7 +622,7 @@ il3945_rs_get_rate(void *il_r, struct ieee80211_sta *sta, void *il_sta,
> D_RATE("enter\n");
>
> /* Treat uninitialized rate scaling data same as non-existing. */
> - if (rs_sta && !rs_sta->il) {
> + if (!rs_sta->il) {
> D_RATE("Rate scaling information not initialized yet.\n");
> il_sta = NULL;
> }
> --
> 2.43.0
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-12 7:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-11 17:11 [PATCH v4] wifi: iwlegacy: 3945-rs: remove redundant pointer check in il3945_rs_tx_status() and il3945_rs_get_rate() Tuo Li
2026-01-12 7:03 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260112070319.GA115711@wp.pl \
--to=stf_xl@wp.pl \
--cc=islituo@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox