From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Subject: [PATCH rtw-next 05/11] wifi: rtw89: rfk: update RFK report format of IQK, DACK and TXGAPK
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 09:39:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260123013957.16418-6-pkshih@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260123013957.16418-1-pkshih@realtek.com>
The report formats of IQK, DACK and TXGAPK are changed. Update them
accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.h | 24 ++++++++++++-------
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++-----
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.h
index 4fa982cbac49..e4dbcd899ddb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.h
@@ -5005,12 +5005,16 @@ struct rtw89_c2h_rf_iqk_rpt_log {
u8 rsvd;
__le32 reload_cnt;
__le32 iqk_fail_cnt;
+ __le32 rf_0x18[2];
__le32 lok_idac[2];
__le32 lok_vbuf[2];
- __le32 rftxgain[2][4];
- __le32 rfrxgain[2][4];
- __le32 tx_xym[2][4];
- __le32 rx_xym[2][4];
+ __le32 rftxgain[2][6];
+ __le32 rfrxgain[2][6];
+ __le32 tx_xym[2][6];
+ __le32 rx_xym[2][6];
+ __le32 rx_wb_xym[2][32];
+ bool is_radar;
+ u8 rsvd1[3];
} __packed;
struct rtw89_c2h_rf_dpk_rpt_log {
@@ -5053,6 +5057,7 @@ struct rtw89_c2h_rf_dack_rpt_log {
u8 dack_fail;
u8 wbdck_d[2];
u8 rck_d;
+ u8 adgaink_ex_d;
} __packed;
struct rtw89_c2h_rf_rxdck_rpt_log {
@@ -5079,12 +5084,14 @@ struct rtw89_c2h_rf_txgapk_rpt_log {
u8 is_txgapk_ok;
u8 chk_id;
u8 ver;
- u8 rsv1;
+ u8 d_bnd_ok;
+ __le32 stage[2];
+ __le16 failcode[2];
+ u8 rsvd[4];
} __packed;
struct rtw89_c2h_rf_txiqk_rpt_log {
u8 fw_txiqk_ver;
- u8 rsvd;
u8 iqk_band[2];
u8 iqk_ch[2];
u8 iqk_bw[2];
@@ -5093,13 +5100,14 @@ struct rtw89_c2h_rf_txiqk_rpt_log {
bool txiqk_en;
bool lok_en;
bool lok_fail[2];
- u8 rsvd2;
+ u8 rsvd[2];
__le32 iqk_times;
bool txiqk_nctldone[2];
- u8 rsvd3[2];
+ u8 rsvd2[2];
__le32 txgain[2][6];
__le32 tx_iqc[2][6];
__le32 tx_xym[2][6][14];
+ __le32 kidx[2];
} __packed;
struct rtw89_c2h_rf_cim3k_rpt_log {
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c
index 11f45e30d76d..41a8ce3aaffc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/phy.c
@@ -3512,6 +3512,8 @@ static void rtw89_phy_c2h_rfk_rpt_log(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
i, iqk->iqk_ch[i]);
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[IQK] iqk->iqk_bw[%d] = %x\n",
i, iqk->iqk_bw[i]);
+ rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[IQK] iqk->rf_0x18[%d] = %x\n",
+ i, le32_to_cpu(iqk->rf_0x18[i]));
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[IQK] iqk->lok_idac[%d] = %x\n",
i, le32_to_cpu(iqk->lok_idac[i]));
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[IQK] iqk->lok_vbuf[%d] = %x\n",
@@ -3520,22 +3522,30 @@ static void rtw89_phy_c2h_rfk_rpt_log(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
i, iqk->iqk_tx_fail[i]);
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[IQK] iqk->iqk_rx_fail[%d] = %x\n",
i, iqk->iqk_rx_fail[i]);
- for (j = 0; j < 4; j++)
+ for (j = 0; j < 6; j++)
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK,
"[IQK] iqk->rftxgain[%d][%d] = %x\n",
i, j, le32_to_cpu(iqk->rftxgain[i][j]));
- for (j = 0; j < 4; j++)
+ for (j = 0; j < 6; j++)
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK,
"[IQK] iqk->tx_xym[%d][%d] = %x\n",
i, j, le32_to_cpu(iqk->tx_xym[i][j]));
- for (j = 0; j < 4; j++)
+ for (j = 0; j < 6; j++)
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK,
"[IQK] iqk->rfrxgain[%d][%d] = %x\n",
i, j, le32_to_cpu(iqk->rfrxgain[i][j]));
- for (j = 0; j < 4; j++)
+ for (j = 0; j < 6; j++)
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK,
"[IQK] iqk->rx_xym[%d][%d] = %x\n",
i, j, le32_to_cpu(iqk->rx_xym[i][j]));
+
+ if (!iqk->iqk_xym_en)
+ continue;
+
+ for (j = 0; j < 32; j++)
+ rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK,
+ "[IQK] iqk->rx_wb_xym[%d][%d] = %x\n",
+ i, j, iqk->rx_wb_xym[i][j]);
}
return;
case RTW89_PHY_C2H_RFK_LOG_FUNC_DPK:
@@ -3691,8 +3701,16 @@ static void rtw89_phy_c2h_rfk_rpt_log(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
le32_to_cpu(txgapk->chk_cnt));
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[TXGAPK]rpt ver = 0x%x\n",
txgapk->ver);
- rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[TXGAPK]rpt rsv1 = %d\n",
- txgapk->rsv1);
+ rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[TXGAPK]rpt d_bnd_ok = %d\n",
+ txgapk->d_bnd_ok);
+ rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[TXGAPK]rpt stage[0] = 0x%x\n",
+ le32_to_cpu(txgapk->stage[0]));
+ rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[TXGAPK]rpt stage[1] = 0x%x\n",
+ le32_to_cpu(txgapk->stage[1]));
+ rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[TXGAPK]failcode[0] = 0x%x\n",
+ le16_to_cpu(txgapk->failcode[0]));
+ rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[TXGAPK]failcode[1] = 0x%x\n",
+ le16_to_cpu(txgapk->failcode[1]));
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_RFK, "[TXGAPK]rpt track_d[0] = %*ph\n",
(int)sizeof(txgapk->track_d[0]), txgapk->track_d[0]);
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-23 1:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-23 1:39 [PATCH rtw-next 00/11] wifi: rtw89: update RFK command/report and REGD R73-R54 Ping-Ke Shih
2026-01-23 1:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 01/11] wifi: rtw89: rfk: add firmware command to do TX IQK Ping-Ke Shih
2026-01-28 3:45 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-01-23 1:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 02/11] wifi: rtw89: rfk: add to print debug log of " Ping-Ke Shih
2026-01-23 1:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 03/11] wifi: rtw89: rfk: add firmware command to do CIM3K Ping-Ke Shih
2026-01-23 1:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 04/11] wifi: rtw89: rfk: add to print debug log of CIM3K Ping-Ke Shih
2026-01-23 1:39 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
2026-01-23 1:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 06/11] wifi: rtw89: fw: correct content of DACK H2C command Ping-Ke Shih
2026-01-23 1:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 07/11] wifi: rtw89: phy: add PHY C2H event dummy handler for func 1-7 and 2-10 Ping-Ke Shih
2026-01-23 1:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 08/11] wifi: rtw89: 8922a: configure FW version for SIM_SER_L0L1_BY_HALT_H2C Ping-Ke Shih
2026-01-23 1:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 09/11] wifi: rtw89: get designated link to replace link instance 0 Ping-Ke Shih
2026-01-23 1:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 10/11] wifi: rtw89: pci: validate release report content before using for RTL8922DE Ping-Ke Shih
2026-01-23 1:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 11/11] wifi: rtw89: regd: update regulatory map to R73-R54 Ping-Ke Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260123013957.16418-6-pkshih@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=kevin_yang@realtek.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox