From: Cole Leavitt <cole@unwrap.rs>
To: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: iwlwifi: prevent NAPI processing after firmware error
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2026 11:47:49 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260218184749.22675-1-cole@unwrap.rs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7f72ac08-6b4a-486b-a8f9-7b78ea0f5ae1@candelatech.com>
Ben,
Thanks for the historical context. I dug through the git history and
your linux-ct repos to verify exactly what happened when. I want to
make sure I have this right - can you confirm whether this matches
what you saw?
2018 Bug (Bug 199209)
---------------------
Fixed by Emmanuel in commit 0eac9abace16 ("iwlwifi: mvm: fix TX of
AMSDU with fragmented SKBs"). That was a different trigger - NFS
created highly fragmented SKBs where nr_frags was so high that the
buffer descriptor limit check produced num_subframes=0. Emmanuel's
fix clamps that path to 1.
Current MLD Bug
---------------
Different path to the same symptom. When TLC disables AMSDU for a
TID, both MVM and MLD set max_tid_amsdu_len[tid] = 1 as a sentinel
value. The key difference in protection:
MVM has a private mvmsta->amsdu_enabled bitmap that gates the entire
AMSDU path:
if (!mvmsta->amsdu_enabled)
return iwl_tx_tso_segment(skb, 1, ...); // bail out early
if (!(mvmsta->amsdu_enabled & BIT(tid)))
return iwl_tx_tso_segment(skb, 1, ...); // bail out early
MVM never reads max_tid_amsdu_len in its TX path - it uses its own
mvmsta->max_amsdu_len. This bitmap was added in commit 84226ca1c5d3
("iwlwifi: mvm: enable AMSDU for all TIDs", Nov 2017).
MLD was designed to use mac80211's sta->cur->max_tid_amsdu_len
directly, with no equivalent bitmap:
max_tid_amsdu_len = sta->cur->max_tid_amsdu_len[tid];
if (!max_tid_amsdu_len) // only catches 0, not sentinel 1!
return iwl_tx_tso_segment(skb, 1, ...);
num_subframes = (max_tid_amsdu_len + pad) / (subf_len + pad);
// When max_tid_amsdu_len=1: num_subframes = (1 + 3) / (1534 + 3) = 0
What I found in your repos:
- linux-ct-6.5-be200, linux-ct-6.10, linux-ct-6.14: No MLD driver,
only MVM with amsdu_enabled bitmap protection
- linux-ct-6.15, linux-ct-6.18: Have MLD driver
(drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mld/)
- backport-iwlwifi: MLD tx.c first appeared in commit 56f903a89
(2024-07-17)
So MVM should have been immune to this specific sentinel-value bug
due to the bitmap check.
Question for you: When you saw TSO segment explosions in 2024, what
kernel and driver were you using? If it was one of your 6.5-6.14
kernels with MVM, then there may be a different path to
num_subframes=0 that I haven't identified yet. If you were using
backport-iwlwifi with MLD enabled, that would explain it hitting the
same bug I'm fixing now.
The commit ae6d30a71521 (Feb 2024) added better error reporting for
skb_gso_segment failures, which suggests people were hitting GSO
segment errors around that time - but I don't have visibility into
what specific trigger you hit.
My fix catches the sentinel-induced zero after the calculation, which
is equivalent to what MVM's bitmap check accomplishes. This should
prevent the current MLD bug from reaching skb_gso_segment with
gso_size=0.
Looking forward to your test results with the problem AP, and any
clarification on what setup you were using in 2024.
Cole
next parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-18 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <7f72ac08-6b4a-486b-a8f9-7b78ea0f5ae1@candelatech.com>
2026-02-18 18:47 ` Cole Leavitt [this message]
2026-02-19 16:38 ` [PATCH] wifi: iwlwifi: prevent NAPI processing after firmware error Ben Greear
[not found] <c6f886d4-b9ed-48a6-9723-a738af055b64@candelatech.com>
2026-02-14 18:10 ` Cole Leavitt
[not found] ` <5be8a502-d53a-4cce-821f-202368c44f6d@candelatech.com>
2026-02-14 18:33 ` Cole Leavitt
2026-02-16 18:12 ` Ben Greear
2026-02-18 14:44 ` Cole Leavitt
2026-02-18 14:44 ` Cole Leavitt
2026-02-18 17:35 ` Ben Greear
2026-02-14 18:41 ` Cole Leavitt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260218184749.22675-1-cole@unwrap.rs \
--to=cole@unwrap.rs \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox