From: "Adrián García Casado" <adriangarciacasado42@gmail.com>
To: Miri Korenblit <miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Miguel Ojeda" <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
"Adrián García Casado" <adriangarciacasado42@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 1/3] wifi: iwlwifi: pcie: migrate to modern pci_alloc_irq_vectors API
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 21:09:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260319200935.23253-1-adriangarciacasado42@gmail.com> (raw)
The iwlwifi driver currently uses the deprecated pci_enable_msix_range()
API and implements a manual loop for interrupt affinity distribution.
This manual approach is less robust than the kernel's core affinity
management and increases maintenance complexity.
Migrate the driver to the modern pci_alloc_irq_vectors() API. Use the
PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY flag to delegate MSI-X affinity distribution to the
kernel core. Remove the manual iwl_pcie_irq_set_affinity() loop as it
is now redundant.
Additionally, remove the unused 'offset' variable to resolve a
previously reported kbuild warning.
Signed-off-by: Adrián García Casado <adriangarciacasado42@gmail.com>
---
.../intel/iwlwifi/pcie/gen1_2/trans.c | 46 ++++++-------------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/gen1_2/trans.c b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/gen1_2/trans.c
index 4560d92d76fe0..e4808cfe1caef 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/gen1_2/trans.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/gen1_2/trans.c
@@ -1274,7 +1274,7 @@ void iwl_pcie_synchronize_irqs(struct iwl_trans *trans)
int i;
for (i = 0; i < trans_pcie->alloc_vecs; i++)
- synchronize_irq(trans_pcie->msix_entries[i].vector);
+ synchronize_irq(pci_irq_vector(trans_pcie->pci_dev, i));
} else {
synchronize_irq(trans_pcie->pci_dev->irq);
}
@@ -1608,18 +1608,20 @@ iwl_pcie_set_interrupt_capa(struct pci_dev *pdev,
max_rx_queues = IWL_9000_MAX_RX_HW_QUEUES;
max_irqs = min_t(u32, num_online_cpus() + 2, max_rx_queues);
- for (i = 0; i < max_irqs; i++)
- trans_pcie->msix_entries[i].entry = i;
-
- num_irqs = pci_enable_msix_range(pdev, trans_pcie->msix_entries,
- MSIX_MIN_INTERRUPT_VECTORS,
- max_irqs);
+ num_irqs = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pdev, MSIX_MIN_INTERRUPT_VECTORS,
+ max_irqs, PCI_IRQ_MSIX | PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY);
if (num_irqs < 0) {
IWL_DEBUG_INFO(trans,
"Failed to enable msi-x mode (ret %d). Moving to msi mode.\n",
num_irqs);
goto enable_msi;
}
+
+ trans_pcie->msix_enabled = true;
+ trans_pcie->alloc_vecs = num_irqs;
+ for (i = 0; i < num_irqs; i++)
+ trans_pcie->msix_entries[i].entry = i;
+
trans_pcie->def_irq = (num_irqs == max_irqs) ? num_irqs - 1 : 0;
IWL_DEBUG_INFO(trans,
@@ -1671,28 +1673,7 @@ iwl_pcie_set_interrupt_capa(struct pci_dev *pdev,
static void iwl_pcie_irq_set_affinity(struct iwl_trans *trans,
struct iwl_trans_info *info)
{
-#if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
- int iter_rx_q, i, ret, cpu, offset;
- struct iwl_trans_pcie *trans_pcie = IWL_TRANS_GET_PCIE_TRANS(trans);
-
- i = trans_pcie->shared_vec_mask & IWL_SHARED_IRQ_FIRST_RSS ? 0 : 1;
- iter_rx_q = info->num_rxqs - 1 + i;
- offset = 1 + i;
- for (; i < iter_rx_q ; i++) {
- /*
- * Get the cpu prior to the place to search
- * (i.e. return will be > i - 1).
- */
- cpu = cpumask_next(i - offset, cpu_online_mask);
- cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &trans_pcie->affinity_mask[i]);
- ret = irq_set_affinity_hint(trans_pcie->msix_entries[i].vector,
- &trans_pcie->affinity_mask[i]);
- if (ret)
- IWL_ERR(trans_pcie->trans,
- "Failed to set affinity mask for IRQ %d\n",
- trans_pcie->msix_entries[i].vector);
- }
-#endif
+ /* Handled by PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY in pci_alloc_irq_vectors() */
}
static int iwl_pcie_init_msix_handler(struct pci_dev *pdev,
@@ -1703,15 +1684,14 @@ static int iwl_pcie_init_msix_handler(struct pci_dev *pdev,
for (i = 0; i < trans_pcie->alloc_vecs; i++) {
int ret;
- struct msix_entry *msix_entry;
+ struct msix_entry *msix_entry = &trans_pcie->msix_entries[i];
const char *qname = queue_name(&pdev->dev, trans_pcie, i);
if (!qname)
return -ENOMEM;
- msix_entry = &trans_pcie->msix_entries[i];
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev,
- msix_entry->vector,
+ pci_irq_vector(pdev, i),
iwl_pcie_msix_isr,
(i == trans_pcie->def_irq) ?
iwl_pcie_irq_msix_handler :
@@ -1988,7 +1968,7 @@ void iwl_trans_pcie_free(struct iwl_trans *trans)
if (trans_pcie->msix_enabled) {
for (i = 0; i < trans_pcie->alloc_vecs; i++) {
irq_set_affinity_hint(
- trans_pcie->msix_entries[i].vector,
+ pci_irq_vector(trans_pcie->pci_dev, i),
NULL);
}
base-commit: f338e77383789c0cae23ca3d48adcc5e9e137e3c
--
2.47.3
reply other threads:[~2026-03-19 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260319200935.23253-1-adriangarciacasado42@gmail.com \
--to=adriangarciacasado42@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=miriam.rachel.korenblit@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox