public inbox for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 05/13] wifi: mt76: mt7925: advertise EHT 320MHz capabilities for 6GHz band
  2026-03-19 22:24 [PATCH v2 00/13] wifi: mt76: mt7925: add MT7927 (Filogic 380) support Javier Tia
@ 2026-03-19 22:24 ` Javier Tia
  2026-03-24 19:24   ` Sean Wang
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Javier Tia @ 2026-03-19 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Felix Fietkau, Lorenzo Bianconi, Ryder Lee, Shayne Chen,
	Sean Wang, Matthias Brugger, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Deren Wu,
	Ming Yen Hsieh
  Cc: linux-wireless, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, linux-mediatek,
	Marcin FM, Cristian-Florin Radoi, George Salukvadze,
	Evgeny Kapusta, Samu Toljamo, Ariel Rosenfeld, Chapuis Dario,
	Thibaut François, 张旭涵

mt7925_init_eht_caps() only populates EHT MCS/NSS maps for BW <= 80
and BW = 160, but never sets BW = 320. This means iw phy shows no
320MHz MCS map entries even though the hardware supports 320MHz
operation in the 6GHz band.

Add the missing 320MHz capability bits for 6GHz, following the same
pattern as mt7996:
  - PHY_CAP0: IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_320MHZ_IN_6GHZ
  - PHY_CAP1: beamformee SS for 320MHz
  - PHY_CAP2: sounding dimensions for 320MHz
  - PHY_CAP6: MCS15 support for 320MHz width
  - PHY_CAP7: non-OFDMA UL MU-MIMO and MU beamformer for 320MHz
  - MCS/NSS: populate bw._320 maps for 6GHz band

Introduce is_320mhz_supported() as a generic capability check using the
mt7925 family ID. This avoids chip-specific references in common code,
and automatically extends to new chips once they join the
is_mt7925() family via chip ID helpers.

Tested-by: Marcin FM <marcin@lgic.pl>
Tested-by: Cristian-Florin Radoi <radoi.chris@gmail.com>
Tested-by: George Salukvadze <giosal90@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Evgeny Kapusta <3193631@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Samu Toljamo <samu.toljamo@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Ariel Rosenfeld <ariel.rosenfeld.750@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Chapuis Dario <chapuisdario4@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Thibaut François <tibo@humeurlibre.fr>
Tested-by: 张旭涵 <Loong.0x00@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Javier Tia <floss@jetm.me>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h |  5 +++++
 drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h
index 813d61bffc2c..554716e01ee6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h
@@ -177,6 +177,11 @@ static inline bool is_mt7925(struct mt76_dev *dev)
 	return mt76_chip(dev) == 0x7925;
 }
 
+static inline bool is_320mhz_supported(struct mt76_dev *dev)
+{
+	return is_mt7925(dev);
+}
+
 static inline bool is_mt7920(struct mt76_dev *dev)
 {
 	return mt76_chip(dev) == 0x7920;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c
index f128a198f81d..cd043ac266fb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c
@@ -183,6 +183,10 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
 		IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_SU_BEAMFORMER |
 		IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_SU_BEAMFORMEE;
 
+	if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76))
+		eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[0] |=
+			IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_320MHZ_IN_6GHZ;
+
 	eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[0] |=
 		u8_encode_bits(u8_get_bits(sts - 1, BIT(0)),
 			       IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_BEAMFORMEE_SS_80MHZ_MASK);
@@ -193,10 +197,20 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
 		u8_encode_bits(sts - 1,
 			       IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP1_BEAMFORMEE_SS_160MHZ_MASK);
 
+	if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76))
+		eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[1] |=
+			u8_encode_bits(sts - 1,
+				       IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP1_BEAMFORMEE_SS_320MHZ_MASK);
+
 	eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[2] =
 		u8_encode_bits(sts - 1, IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP2_SOUNDING_DIM_80MHZ_MASK) |
 		u8_encode_bits(sts - 1, IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP2_SOUNDING_DIM_160MHZ_MASK);
 
+	if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76))
+		eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[2] |=
+			u8_encode_bits(sts - 1,
+				       IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP2_SOUNDING_DIM_320MHZ_MASK);
+
 	eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[3] =
 		IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP3_NG_16_SU_FEEDBACK |
 		IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP3_NG_16_MU_FEEDBACK |
@@ -217,7 +231,8 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
 		u8_encode_bits(u8_get_bits(0x11, GENMASK(1, 0)),
 			       IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP5_MAX_NUM_SUPP_EHT_LTF_MASK);
 
-	val = width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_160 ? 0x7 :
+	val = width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_320 ? 0xf :
+	      width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_160 ? 0x7 :
 	      width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_80 ? 0x3 : 0x1;
 	eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[6] =
 		u8_encode_bits(u8_get_bits(0x11, GENMASK(4, 2)),
@@ -230,6 +245,11 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
 		IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP7_MU_BEAMFORMER_80MHZ |
 		IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP7_MU_BEAMFORMER_160MHZ;
 
+	if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76))
+		eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[7] |=
+			IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP7_NON_OFDMA_UL_MU_MIMO_320MHZ |
+			IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP7_MU_BEAMFORMER_320MHZ;
+
 	val = u8_encode_bits(nss, IEEE80211_EHT_MCS_NSS_RX) |
 	      u8_encode_bits(nss, IEEE80211_EHT_MCS_NSS_TX);
 
@@ -239,6 +259,12 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
 	eht_nss->bw._160.rx_tx_mcs9_max_nss = val;
 	eht_nss->bw._160.rx_tx_mcs11_max_nss = val;
 	eht_nss->bw._160.rx_tx_mcs13_max_nss = val;
+
+	if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76)) {
+		eht_nss->bw._320.rx_tx_mcs9_max_nss = val;
+		eht_nss->bw._320.rx_tx_mcs11_max_nss = val;
+		eht_nss->bw._320.rx_tx_mcs13_max_nss = val;
+	}
 }
 
 int mt7925_init_mlo_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy)

-- 
2.53.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] wifi: mt76: mt7925: advertise EHT 320MHz capabilities for 6GHz band
  2026-03-19 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] wifi: mt76: mt7925: advertise EHT 320MHz capabilities for 6GHz band Javier Tia
@ 2026-03-24 19:24   ` Sean Wang
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sean Wang @ 2026-03-24 19:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Javier Tia
  Cc: Felix Fietkau, Lorenzo Bianconi, Ryder Lee, Shayne Chen,
	Sean Wang, Matthias Brugger, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Deren Wu,
	Ming Yen Hsieh, linux-wireless, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Marcin FM, Cristian-Florin Radoi,
	George Salukvadze, Evgeny Kapusta, Samu Toljamo, Ariel Rosenfeld,
	Chapuis Dario, Thibaut François, 张旭涵

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 19, 2026 at 5:26 PM Javier Tia <floss@jetm.me> wrote:
>
> mt7925_init_eht_caps() only populates EHT MCS/NSS maps for BW <= 80
> and BW = 160, but never sets BW = 320. This means iw phy shows no
> 320MHz MCS map entries even though the hardware supports 320MHz
> operation in the 6GHz band.
>
> Add the missing 320MHz capability bits for 6GHz, following the same
> pattern as mt7996:
>   - PHY_CAP0: IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_320MHZ_IN_6GHZ
>   - PHY_CAP1: beamformee SS for 320MHz
>   - PHY_CAP2: sounding dimensions for 320MHz
>   - PHY_CAP6: MCS15 support for 320MHz width
>   - PHY_CAP7: non-OFDMA UL MU-MIMO and MU beamformer for 320MHz
>   - MCS/NSS: populate bw._320 maps for 6GHz band
>
> Introduce is_320mhz_supported() as a generic capability check using the
> mt7925 family ID. This avoids chip-specific references in common code,
> and automatically extends to new chips once they join the
> is_mt7925() family via chip ID helpers.
>
> Tested-by: Marcin FM <marcin@lgic.pl>
> Tested-by: Cristian-Florin Radoi <radoi.chris@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: George Salukvadze <giosal90@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Evgeny Kapusta <3193631@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Samu Toljamo <samu.toljamo@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Ariel Rosenfeld <ariel.rosenfeld.750@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Chapuis Dario <chapuisdario4@gmail.com>
> Tested-by: Thibaut François <tibo@humeurlibre.fr>
> Tested-by: 张旭涵 <Loong.0x00@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Javier Tia <floss@jetm.me>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h |  5 +++++
>  drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h
> index 813d61bffc2c..554716e01ee6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac.h
> @@ -177,6 +177,11 @@ static inline bool is_mt7925(struct mt76_dev *dev)
>         return mt76_chip(dev) == 0x7925;
>  }
>
> +static inline bool is_320mhz_supported(struct mt76_dev *dev)
> +{
> +       return is_mt7925(dev);

I don't think this is correct for mt7925, and it will cause a
regression there. Was this tested on actual mt7925 hardware?

> +}
> +
>  static inline bool is_mt7920(struct mt76_dev *dev)
>  {
>         return mt76_chip(dev) == 0x7920;
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c
> index f128a198f81d..cd043ac266fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7925/main.c
> @@ -183,6 +183,10 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
>                 IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_SU_BEAMFORMER |
>                 IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_SU_BEAMFORMEE;
>
> +       if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76))
> +               eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[0] |=
> +                       IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_320MHZ_IN_6GHZ;
> +
>         eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[0] |=
>                 u8_encode_bits(u8_get_bits(sts - 1, BIT(0)),
>                                IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP0_BEAMFORMEE_SS_80MHZ_MASK);
> @@ -193,10 +197,20 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
>                 u8_encode_bits(sts - 1,
>                                IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP1_BEAMFORMEE_SS_160MHZ_MASK);
>
> +       if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76))
> +               eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[1] |=
> +                       u8_encode_bits(sts - 1,
> +                                      IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP1_BEAMFORMEE_SS_320MHZ_MASK);
> +
>         eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[2] =
>                 u8_encode_bits(sts - 1, IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP2_SOUNDING_DIM_80MHZ_MASK) |
>                 u8_encode_bits(sts - 1, IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP2_SOUNDING_DIM_160MHZ_MASK);
>
> +       if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76))
> +               eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[2] |=
> +                       u8_encode_bits(sts - 1,
> +                                      IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP2_SOUNDING_DIM_320MHZ_MASK);
> +
>         eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[3] =
>                 IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP3_NG_16_SU_FEEDBACK |
>                 IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP3_NG_16_MU_FEEDBACK |
> @@ -217,7 +231,8 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
>                 u8_encode_bits(u8_get_bits(0x11, GENMASK(1, 0)),
>                                IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP5_MAX_NUM_SUPP_EHT_LTF_MASK);
>
> -       val = width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_160 ? 0x7 :
> +       val = width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_320 ? 0xf :
> +             width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_160 ? 0x7 :
>               width == NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_80 ? 0x3 : 0x1;
>         eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[6] =
>                 u8_encode_bits(u8_get_bits(0x11, GENMASK(4, 2)),
> @@ -230,6 +245,11 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
>                 IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP7_MU_BEAMFORMER_80MHZ |
>                 IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP7_MU_BEAMFORMER_160MHZ;
>
> +       if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76))
> +               eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[7] |=
> +                       IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP7_NON_OFDMA_UL_MU_MIMO_320MHZ |
> +                       IEEE80211_EHT_PHY_CAP7_MU_BEAMFORMER_320MHZ;
> +

I don't think this should be copied from mt7996 as-is for mt7927. I'd
suggest dropping the eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[7] change and keeping
it conservative for now.

>         val = u8_encode_bits(nss, IEEE80211_EHT_MCS_NSS_RX) |
>               u8_encode_bits(nss, IEEE80211_EHT_MCS_NSS_TX);
>
> @@ -239,6 +259,12 @@ mt7925_init_eht_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy, enum nl80211_band band,
>         eht_nss->bw._160.rx_tx_mcs9_max_nss = val;
>         eht_nss->bw._160.rx_tx_mcs11_max_nss = val;
>         eht_nss->bw._160.rx_tx_mcs13_max_nss = val;
> +
> +       if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && is_320mhz_supported(&phy->dev->mt76)) {
> +               eht_nss->bw._320.rx_tx_mcs9_max_nss = val;
> +               eht_nss->bw._320.rx_tx_mcs11_max_nss = val;
> +               eht_nss->bw._320.rx_tx_mcs13_max_nss = val;
> +       }
>  }
>
>  int mt7925_init_mlo_caps(struct mt792x_phy *phy)
>
> --
> 2.53.0
>
>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 05/13] wifi: mt76: mt7925: advertise EHT 320MHz capabilities for 6GHz band
@ 2026-03-26  0:18 Javier Tia
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Javier Tia @ 2026-03-26  0:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sean Wang
  Cc: Felix Fietkau, Lorenzo Bianconi, Ryder Lee, Shayne Chen,
	Sean Wang, Matthias Brugger, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno, Deren Wu,
	Ming Yen Hsieh, linux-wireless, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-mediatek, Marcin FM, Cristian-Florin Radoi,
	George Salukvadze, Evgeny Kapusta, Samu Toljamo, Ariel Rosenfeld,
	Chapuis Dario, Thibaut François, 张旭涵

Hi Sean,

On Mon, Mar 24, 2026 Sean Wang wrote:
> I don't think this is correct for mt7925, and it will cause a
> regression there. Was this tested on actual mt7925 hardware?

You are right. I do not have mt7925 hardware to verify against.
In v3, is_320mhz_supported() now checks is_mt7927() only, so
mt7925 behavior is unchanged.

> I don't think this should be copied from mt7996 as-is for mt7927. I'd
> suggest dropping the eht_cap_elem->phy_cap_info[7] change and keeping
> it conservative for now.

Agreed. The phy_cap_info[7] additions (NON_OFDMA_UL_MU_MIMO_320MHZ
and MU_BEAMFORMER_320MHZ) are dropped in v3. Only the MCS/NSS maps
and per-BW beamformee SS/sounding dimensions for 320MHz remain.

Both changes are in v3, sent today.

Best,
Javier

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-03-26  0:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-03-26  0:18 [PATCH v2 05/13] wifi: mt76: mt7925: advertise EHT 320MHz capabilities for 6GHz band Javier Tia
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-19 22:24 [PATCH v2 00/13] wifi: mt76: mt7925: add MT7927 (Filogic 380) support Javier Tia
2026-03-19 22:24 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] wifi: mt76: mt7925: advertise EHT 320MHz capabilities for 6GHz band Javier Tia
2026-03-24 19:24   ` Sean Wang

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox