From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B12512848AF for ; Fri, 27 Mar 2026 01:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774574381; cv=none; b=awlf6/FNYeiUqYJ1PcjG3pg+a7PdHC9EnA6nHDEFUOC4HUgE2Tsf0PgykCsaInag41DMCUut7i7aeEcoexr7c7EqNyn3ilJXZK3G4jxZchop+7qNSbRdEkhqvYUXFuR4r5b6HGxnzHSVfd3rgY+gGDqWs7hIrKGzGTTF/ykc7ek= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774574381; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ST4a6J8k+JgxcruFgtrzW9/5OdlYAyuhFmLv2i4YfqY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LBsCThzn26g4X8+L8/0A+i/Nlg3814+1zmcJgfsZdgrWHQr/fjpamBUIjsu9YkI5H9OEyGaGI+/cX7y8L5vRwblfEWe8478rGhEQKnKmdz95P9eF8BTwjjLiHaCjtpAsFswOJKZHpAO5fxhj4UPa9Vho9AvmsdUi82HsGXX1Z0s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=O2/ila4y; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="O2/ila4y" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1774574379; x=1806110379; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=ST4a6J8k+JgxcruFgtrzW9/5OdlYAyuhFmLv2i4YfqY=; b=O2/ila4yR33lUKYWJ0U4/iclwQbLD3aRmj7sZ4Nk5WsQrIHiIeZKlApY cTbm0To4cWVGUcUKf78x5mu4nDDKTDD29ePuEG7ZIBXSPdHZc2wZjQe3X pi0tg/3bK8RSoslfAfrDIt0QILDxRgx821vIKoGqBIok8kkEn4ocEHlPF tcwsLiYSITjID6TSGTqCy/uQ9BM1SbteK8I1KyvZ0Ad3TL8zmSX34h4qo xYkEdrkhwgu2f6p0nUz6tLmo7KBlWPr3eh+PqSGWz8sp8CPdR4X+As7TJ H+8FgDz4Z6rnTgGE57UE15Ze2oTi5W4irrSPYv5MWoKNNoJyx/1+wJjpP w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: Al++v7vWTFm4vtvdOdPTPg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: vahrttdFThW9pl3DC4LAXA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11741"; a="93227508" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,143,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="93227508" Received: from fmviesa003.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.143]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Mar 2026 18:19:38 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: IJDtDy/7RnuOcAZWSxJQpA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: HSCRjG2hQTqh7Oxb5Z8osw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 3905d212be1b) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Mar 2026 18:19:37 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 3905d212be1b with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1w5vrK-000000009cj-0R3i; Fri, 27 Mar 2026 01:19:34 +0000 Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2026 09:19:07 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Bitterblue Smith , "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Ping-Ke Shih Subject: Re: [PATCH rtw-next] wifi: rtw89: Fill fw_version member of struct wiphy Message-ID: <202603270937.xDZo9uy9-lkp@intel.com> References: <60bdb2f8-d5dd-46a3-8679-5b4a5fd0604b@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <60bdb2f8-d5dd-46a3-8679-5b4a5fd0604b@gmail.com> Hi Bitterblue, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on wireless-next/main] [also build test ERROR on wireless/main linus/master v7.0-rc5 next-20260325] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Bitterblue-Smith/wifi-rtw89-Fill-fw_version-member-of-struct-wiphy/20260326-082721 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/wireless/wireless-next.git main patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/60bdb2f8-d5dd-46a3-8679-5b4a5fd0604b%40gmail.com patch subject: [PATCH rtw-next] wifi: rtw89: Fill fw_version member of struct wiphy config: nios2-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260327/202603270937.xDZo9uy9-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: nios2-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.5.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260327/202603270937.xDZo9uy9-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202603270937.xDZo9uy9-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c: In function 'rtw89_fw_update_ver': >> drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c:759:21: error: 'RTW89_FW_NORMAL_B' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'RTW89_FW_NORMAL_CE'? 759 | type == RTW89_FW_NORMAL_B) | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ | RTW89_FW_NORMAL_CE drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c:759:21: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in vim +759 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c 726 727 static int rtw89_fw_update_ver(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, 728 enum rtw89_fw_type type, 729 struct rtw89_fw_suit *fw_suit) 730 { 731 const struct rtw89_fw_hdr *v0 = (const struct rtw89_fw_hdr *)fw_suit->data; 732 const struct rtw89_fw_hdr_v1 *v1 = (const struct rtw89_fw_hdr_v1 *)fw_suit->data; 733 734 if (type == RTW89_FW_LOGFMT) 735 return 0; 736 737 fw_suit->type = type; 738 fw_suit->hdr_ver = le32_get_bits(v0->w3, FW_HDR_W3_HDR_VER); 739 740 switch (fw_suit->hdr_ver) { 741 case 0: 742 rtw89_fw_update_ver_v0(rtwdev, fw_suit, v0); 743 break; 744 case 1: 745 rtw89_fw_update_ver_v1(rtwdev, fw_suit, v1); 746 break; 747 default: 748 rtw89_err(rtwdev, "Unknown firmware header version %u\n", 749 fw_suit->hdr_ver); 750 return -ENOENT; 751 } 752 753 rtw89_info(rtwdev, 754 "Firmware version %u.%u.%u.%u (%08x), cmd version %u, type %u\n", 755 fw_suit->major_ver, fw_suit->minor_ver, fw_suit->sub_ver, 756 fw_suit->sub_idex, fw_suit->commitid, fw_suit->cmd_ver, type); 757 758 if (type == RTW89_FW_NORMAL || type == RTW89_FW_NORMAL_CE || > 759 type == RTW89_FW_NORMAL_B) 760 snprintf(rtwdev->hw->wiphy->fw_version, 761 sizeof(rtwdev->hw->wiphy->fw_version), 762 "%u.%u.%u.%u", 763 fw_suit->major_ver, fw_suit->minor_ver, 764 fw_suit->sub_ver, fw_suit->sub_idex); 765 766 return 0; 767 } 768 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki