From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.bues.ch (bues.ch [116.203.120.240]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F01453DB626; Mon, 25 May 2026 08:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.120.240 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779696493; cv=none; b=CRb1AW9nWp7bcUqShRtoMyr25HPcD56qre/OQ2VDrL7qp+pOhZSZ2VvF9vfdmSnkEpFU8w7WaeNMrCLHfwqOXPMB/vKj0odJyWrU3WVzDid/w1LKgM76sDzmapFUeF0rdzDGFJDywllKBM8tXm+WvXZxPmd7E4SmmNMV1V6fXeY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779696493; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nGU4MjUTgnIx/L/+8NOfdZRN3bLNzYYQG8Cg+uRwiuA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=qN09NG1tQK9QOJE4pJG1nRsnnljrswrU09EpHgGgSTff4KOAfNIXkFVrUofw3LAzCNkDvXR1x4+zBcivtQYC+o3hcC2ZJZf+b1V76sPPvcciUmj6vBJMmaxMp1xYfihMviC3r9fpm3usbYYhvrTPpiMNQGxdT4muCBRa6yS8Leo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=bues.ch; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bues.ch; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bues.ch header.i=@bues.ch header.b=KRG1fQQv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.120.240 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=bues.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bues.ch Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bues.ch header.i=@bues.ch header.b="KRG1fQQv" Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 10:07:52 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bues.ch; s=main; t=1779696483; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=ivGnYQGwHypA/E82Fk3MIbZRzRtPVXV32W0d+O471x8=; b=KRG1fQQvbcUtKDtnKxtLcBMpJiYpE8vHGCAWe47TVMfpBxnfn8LBp4I6b3kcdiU9xXjprp 1Rv4SUh0qaK4VCChBCxwD9XGHo7rXdXOHMrf+BWNIqcHp23eZsYpnI2SP677gSussNpzqd 0GU/LHoXD0mxCrMHJWIkq9nsxKPaK1ykVEEGo5tl1xWnU4n3u2aNDuSxguboPO4y3JP0dW 5XoLE3ommyBi3hHkM+N+emUK4GdJO2LBtWKMgDW6MCG58hT8klghIa25+51BNuMLMTGJBy cyfeaVmIbpCLIfnKdSu7Vju1fDNAWdeVuuE2bp692JqHSD51jxxyzhFCdgxvGA== From: Michael =?UTF-8?B?QsO8c2No?= To: Alessio Ferri Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] b43: complete N-PHY rev 8 + radio 2057 rev 8 support Message-ID: <20260525100752.16cdb59e@barney> In-Reply-To: <20260524-b43_complete_n_phy_rev_8_radio_2057_rev_8_support-v1-0-cdad2c8526c6@gmail.com> References: <20260524-b43_complete_n_phy_rev_8_radio_2057_rev_8_support-v1-0-cdad2c8526c6@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.4.0 (GTK 3.24.52; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/5s+bOMwc0HHsEDOgBDTv5Fv"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512 --Sig_/5s+bOMwc0HHsEDOgBDTv5Fv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 24 May 2026 23:56:17 +0200 Alessio Ferri wrote: > Alessio Ferri (7): > b43: add firmware mappings and remove comments wondering about rev2= 2 initvals > b43: add d11 core revision 0x16 to id table > b43: route d11 corerev 22 to 24-bit indirect radio access > b43: support radio 2057 rev 8 > b43: add IPA TX gain table for N-PHY r8 + radio 2057 r8 > b43: add channel info table for N-PHY r8 + radio 2057 r8 > b43: add RF power offset for N-PHY r8 + radio 2057 r8 >=20 > drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/main.c | 22 ++- > drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/radio_2057.c | 230 ++++++++++++++++++= ++++-- > drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/tables_nphy.c | 58 ++++++ > 3 files changed, 290 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) Looks good and in general low risk because it doesn't change any code paths of supported hw revisions. I'd still prefer if somebody could test this change on another supported 20= 57 radio. I don't have such a device unfortunately. Does the D-Link DSL-3580L work with full expected wireless throughput after= this change or are there any remaining known issues? Acked-by: Michael B=C3=BCsch --=20 Michael B=C3=BCsch https://bues.ch/ --Sig_/5s+bOMwc0HHsEDOgBDTv5Fv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEihRzkKVZOnT2ipsS9TK+HZCNiw4FAmoUA1gACgkQ9TK+HZCN iw7YQA//ds+rSVNTrHzM08KTsGl/0w5pEIUYEWH7cA8MialR55T3d6B+CEbbvegD x2x5YGn20qP9nXHcWf4zt4IE23lRVo/Xd7htUAJv3KSU5reuwWUa9XAFQE56kjXZ cU8bPESMlNk8Redqzxdcq2osLxsZ1MmTTXdjPJZB/TWLovGN+ZKNik8BeM1n9IYj Hq37z99Y3aUBx6le6TkcqRnt98KdE27thlMU0PM7ucSAUGVQ3NJC9BlHvGvlMR32 lKToR5PKPKm11Yi1WwphYdilzxpUgxwuCN0vE7DbE3ZUTNJKYHUiEGlwTD1xO8qA LLMgLIN7oIrKBnArD1Kro/z5w8Mccg7/d/mMgjUpKeEWzmUFe50poH2lKRmryoGb NALzix/c6XSpcaNvZ9u85X+cKSLKdiChwHXmu+MNvtrKUw5i5Crr8qOtPrSkxzCq K5FZUEvY/op/z8NkDmwaGkEqthUSrHCokEOIufOCIWMV8W3sxKlojBhQHXSwdDFi iXJSZuXnkMcYoaPQFPnEmIM7KN1l3LrM96FDWDmHcoRCGFJkEHQkyzphHxKdjo3Q hIQT8WwACvoTiJUCZ+EiuCSZ3Y6fYxEAmgV++a9S5rzqSiKyLwwJt8zo2Nay6hdK W4MTceg4dllkP+H4koQ3V7jvGFyX8cm7K+pLM7PT0jinf6cfMxk= =ukAu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/5s+bOMwc0HHsEDOgBDTv5Fv--