From: Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl>
To: Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
Cc: Gertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>,
"John W . Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
Ivo van Doorn <IvDoorn@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless] wifi: rt2x00: avoid full teardown before work setup in probe
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 16:31:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260619143149.GA61690@wp.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260619073104.1809161-1-runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 19, 2026 at 03:31:04PM +0800, Runyu Xiao wrote:
> rt2x00lib_probe_dev() uses the full rt2x00lib_remove_dev() teardown for
> all probe failures. However, drv_data allocation and workqueue allocation
> can fail before intf_work, autowakeup_work and sleep_work have been
> initialized.
>
> Do not enter the full remove path until the probe has reached the point
> where those work items are set up. Return directly for drv_data allocation
> failure, and use a small early cleanup path for workqueue allocation
> failure.
>
> This issue was found by our static analysis tool and then confirmed by
> manual review of rt2x00lib_probe_dev() and rt2x00lib_remove_dev(). The
> early probe exits should not call a common teardown path that assumes the
> later work setup has already completed.
>
> A QEMU PoC forced alloc_ordered_workqueue() to fail before the work
> initializers are reached. The resulting fail path entered
> rt2x00lib_remove_dev(), and DEBUG_OBJECTS reported invalid work drains with
> rt2x00lib_probe_dev() and rt2x00lib_remove_dev() in the stack.
Thanks for finding and fixing those bugs. The patch looks fine, but I think
it could be a bit simpler, see the comments below.
> Fixes: 1ebbc48520a0 ("rt2x00: Introduce concept of driver data in struct rt2x00_dev.")
> Fixes: 0439f5367c8d ("rt2x00: Move TX/RX work into dedicated workqueue")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Runyu Xiao <runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c
> index f8a6f9c968a1..847b64e586f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ralink/rt2x00/rt2x00dev.c
> @@ -1382,7 +1382,7 @@ int rt2x00lib_probe_dev(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!rt2x00dev->drv_data) {
> retval = -ENOMEM;
> - goto exit;
> + return retval;
This can be just "return -ENOMEM;"
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1416,7 +1416,7 @@ int rt2x00lib_probe_dev(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> alloc_ordered_workqueue("%s", 0, wiphy_name(rt2x00dev->hw->wiphy));
> if (!rt2x00dev->workqueue) {
> retval = -ENOMEM;
> - goto exit;
> + goto exit_free_drv_data;
> }
>
> INIT_WORK(&rt2x00dev->intf_work, rt2x00lib_intf_scheduled);
I think should be sufficient to move INIT_*WORK's lines before
alloc_ordered_workqueue() to avoid cancel_*_work_sync() on uninitialized data.
And other de-init code from rt2x00lib_remove_dev() should work fine at this
point.
Regards
Stanislaw
> @@ -1488,6 +1488,14 @@ int rt2x00lib_probe_dev(struct rt2x00_dev *rt2x00dev)
> exit:
> rt2x00lib_remove_dev(rt2x00dev);
>
> + return retval;
> +
> +exit_free_drv_data:
> + clear_bit(DEVICE_STATE_PRESENT, &rt2x00dev->flags);
> +
> + kfree(rt2x00dev->drv_data);
> + rt2x00dev->drv_data = NULL;
> +
> return retval;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rt2x00lib_probe_dev);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-19 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-19 7:31 [PATCH wireless] wifi: rt2x00: avoid full teardown before work setup in probe Runyu Xiao
2026-06-19 14:31 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260619143149.GA61690@wp.pl \
--to=stf_xl@wp.pl \
--cc=IvDoorn@gmail.com \
--cc=gwingerde@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=runyu.xiao@seu.edu.cn \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox