From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <ku920601@realtek.com>
Subject: [PATCH rtw-next 03/10] wifi: rtw89: coex: Move wifi related counters to wifi info
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 11:39:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260624033941.45918-4-pkshih@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260624033941.45918-1-pkshih@realtek.com>
From: Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@realtek.com>
Move wifi related counters to wifi main info, it is to facilitate
the after modification for dual MAC wifi structure.
Signed-off-by: Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 80 +++++++++++------------
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
index f857ba247c23..e4662e7b74e0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
@@ -3411,7 +3411,7 @@ static void _set_bt_afh_info_v0(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_BTC,
"[BTC], %s(): en=%d, ch=%d, bw=%d\n",
__func__, en, ch, bw);
- btc->cx.cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_CH_UPDATE]++;
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_CH_UPDATE]++;
}
static void _set_bt_afh_info_v1(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
@@ -3511,7 +3511,7 @@ static void _set_bt_afh_info_v1(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
"[BTC], %s(): en=%d, ch=%d, bw=%d\n",
__func__, en, ch, bw);
- btc->cx.cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_CH_UPDATE]++;
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_CH_UPDATE]++;
}
}
@@ -5630,7 +5630,7 @@ static void _action_common(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_BTC, "[BTC], write scbd: 0x%08x\n",
wl->scbd);
wl->scbd_change = false;
- btc->cx.cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_SCBDUPDATE]++;
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_SCBDUPDATE]++;
}
if (btc->ver->fcxosi) {
@@ -6877,7 +6877,7 @@ static void _update_wl_info_v7(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u8 rid)
if (wl_rinfo->dbcc_en != rtwdev->dbcc_en) {
wl_rinfo->dbcc_chg = 1;
wl_rinfo->dbcc_en = rtwdev->dbcc_en;
- btc->cx.cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_DBCC_CHG]++;
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_DBCC_CHG]++;
}
if (rtwdev->dbcc_en) {
@@ -7321,7 +7321,7 @@ static void _update_wl_info_v8(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u8 role_id, u8 rlink_id
if (wl_rinfo->dbcc_en != dbcc_en_ori) {
wl->dbcc_chg = true;
- btc->cx.cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_DBCC_CHG]++;
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_DBCC_CHG]++;
}
}
@@ -7378,7 +7378,7 @@ void rtw89_coex_rfk_chk_work(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct wiphy_work *work)
if (wl->rfk_info.state != BTC_WRFK_STOP) {
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_BTC,
"[BTC], %s(): RFK timeout\n", __func__);
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_TIMEOUT]++;
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_TIMEOUT]++;
dm->error.map.wl_rfk_timeout = true;
wl->rfk_info.state = BTC_WRFK_STOP;
_write_scbd(rtwdev, BTC_WSCB_WLRFK, false);
@@ -7520,13 +7520,13 @@ static bool _chk_wl_rfk_request(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
_update_bt_scbd(rtwdev, true);
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REQ]++;
+ cx->wl.wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REQ]++;
if ((bt->rfk_info.map.run || bt->rfk_info.map.req) &&
!bt->rfk_info.map.timeout) {
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REJECT]++;
+ cx->wl.wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REJECT]++;
} else {
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_GO]++;
+ cx->wl.wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_GO]++;
return true;
}
return false;
@@ -7934,14 +7934,14 @@ void rtw89_btc_ntfy_specific_packet(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
switch (pkt_type) {
case PACKET_DHCP:
- cnt = ++cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_DHCP];
+ cnt = ++wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_DHCP];
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_BTC,
"[BTC], %s(): DHCP cnt=%d\n", __func__, cnt);
wl->status.map.connecting = true;
delay_work = true;
break;
case PACKET_EAPOL:
- cnt = ++cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_EAPOL];
+ cnt = ++wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_EAPOL];
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_BTC,
"[BTC], %s(): EAPOL cnt=%d\n", __func__, cnt);
wl->status.map._4way = true;
@@ -7950,7 +7950,7 @@ void rtw89_btc_ntfy_specific_packet(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
delay /= 2;
break;
case PACKET_EAPOL_END:
- cnt = ++cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_EAPOL];
+ cnt = ++wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_EAPOL];
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_BTC,
"[BTC], %s(): EAPOL_End cnt=%d\n",
__func__, cnt);
@@ -7958,7 +7958,7 @@ void rtw89_btc_ntfy_specific_packet(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
wiphy_delayed_work_cancel(rtwdev->hw->wiphy, &rtwdev->coex_act1_work);
break;
case PACKET_ARP:
- cnt = ++cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_ARP];
+ cnt = ++wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_ARP];
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_BTC,
"[BTC], %s(): ARP cnt=%d\n", __func__, cnt);
return;
@@ -10913,7 +10913,7 @@ static int _show_mreg_v1(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, char *buf, size_t bufsz)
p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
" %-15s : WL->BT:0x%08x(cnt:%d), BT->WL:0x%08x(total:%d, bt_update:%d)\n",
"[scoreboard]", wl->scbd,
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_SCBDUPDATE],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_SCBDUPDATE],
bt->scbd, cx->cnt_bt[BTC_BCNT_SCBDREAD],
cx->cnt_bt[BTC_BCNT_SCBDUPDATE]);
@@ -10998,7 +10998,7 @@ static int _show_mreg_v2(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, char *buf, size_t bufsz)
p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
" %-15s : WL->BT:0x%08x(cnt:%d), BT->WL:0x%08x(total:%d, bt_update:%d)\n",
"[scoreboard]", wl->scbd,
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_SCBDUPDATE],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_SCBDUPDATE],
bt->scbd, cx->cnt_bt[BTC_BCNT_SCBDREAD],
cx->cnt_bt[BTC_BCNT_SCBDUPDATE]);
@@ -11083,7 +11083,7 @@ static int _show_mreg_v7(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, char *buf, size_t bufsz)
p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
"\n\r %-15s : WL->BT:0x%08x(cnt:%d), BT->WL:0x%08x(total:%d, bt_update:%d)",
"[scoreboard]", wl->scbd,
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_SCBDUPDATE],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_SCBDUPDATE],
bt->scbd, cx->cnt_bt[BTC_BCNT_SCBDREAD],
cx->cnt_bt[BTC_BCNT_SCBDUPDATE]);
@@ -11189,10 +11189,10 @@ static int _show_summary_v1(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, char *buf, size_t bufsz)
p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
" %-15s : wl_rfk[req:%d/go:%d/reject:%d/timeout:%d]",
- "[RFK]", cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REQ],
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_GO],
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REJECT],
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_TIMEOUT]);
+ "[RFK]", wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REQ],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_GO],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REJECT],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_TIMEOUT]);
p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
", bt_rfk[req:%d/go:%d/reject:%d/timeout:%d/fail:%d]\n",
@@ -11304,10 +11304,10 @@ static int _show_summary_v4(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, char *buf, size_t bufsz)
p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
" %-15s : wl_rfk[req:%d/go:%d/reject:%d/timeout:%d]",
- "[RFK]", cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REQ],
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_GO],
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REJECT],
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_TIMEOUT]);
+ "[RFK]", wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REQ],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_GO],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REJECT],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_TIMEOUT]);
p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
", bt_rfk[req:%d/go:%d/reject:%d/timeout:%d/fail:%d]\n",
@@ -11418,10 +11418,10 @@ static int _show_summary_v5(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, char *buf, size_t bufsz)
p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
" %-15s : wl_rfk[req:%d/go:%d/reject:%d/tout:%d]",
- "[RFK/LPS]", cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REQ],
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_GO],
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REJECT],
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_TIMEOUT]);
+ "[RFK/LPS]", wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REQ],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_GO],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REJECT],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_TIMEOUT]);
p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
", bt_rfk[req:%d]",
@@ -11539,10 +11539,10 @@ static int _show_summary_v105(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, char *buf, size_t bufsz)
p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
" %-15s : wl_rfk[req:%d/go:%d/reject:%d/tout:%d]",
- "[RFK/LPS]", cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REQ],
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_GO],
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REJECT],
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_TIMEOUT]);
+ "[RFK/LPS]", wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REQ],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_GO],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REJECT],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_TIMEOUT]);
p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
", bt_rfk[req:%d]",
@@ -11664,10 +11664,10 @@ static int _show_summary_v7(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, char *buf, size_t bufsz)
p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
"\n\r %-15s : wl_rfk[req:%d/go:%d/reject:%d/tout:%d/time:%dms]",
- "[RFK/LPS]", cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REQ],
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_GO],
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REJECT],
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_TIMEOUT],
+ "[RFK/LPS]", wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REQ],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_GO],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REJECT],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_TIMEOUT],
wl->rfk_info.proc_time);
p += scnprintf(p, end - p, ", bt_rfk[req:%d]",
@@ -11777,10 +11777,10 @@ static int _show_summary_v8(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, char *buf, size_t bufsz)
p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
"\n\r %-15s : wl_rfk[req:%d/go:%d/reject:%d/tout:%d/time:%dms]",
- "[RFK/LPS]", cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REQ],
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_GO],
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REJECT],
- cx->cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_RFK_TIMEOUT],
+ "[RFK/LPS]", wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REQ],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_GO],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REJECT],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_TIMEOUT],
wl->rfk_info.proc_time);
p += scnprintf(p, end - p, ", bt_rfk[req:%d]",
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
index 2f12252bc26e..0abbde6a2013 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
@@ -2078,6 +2078,7 @@ struct rtw89_btc_wl_info {
bool link_mode_chg;
bool dbcc_chg;
u32 scbd;
+ u32 wcnt[BTC_WCNT_NUM];
};
struct rtw89_btc_module {
@@ -2267,7 +2268,6 @@ struct rtw89_btc_cx {
struct rtw89_btc_3rdcx_info other;
u32 state_map;
u32 cnt_bt[BTC_BCNT_NUM];
- u32 cnt_wl[BTC_WCNT_NUM];
};
struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_tdma {
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-24 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-24 3:39 [PATCH rtw-next 00/10] wifi: rtw89: coex: update BT coexistence to support dual BT for RTL8922D Ping-Ke Shih
2026-06-24 3:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 01/10] wifi: rtw89: coex: force to exit Wi-Fi LPS while Bluetooth profile exist Ping-Ke Shih
2026-06-24 3:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 02/10] wifi: rtw89: coex: offset current BT info to BT0 for dual BT configuration Ping-Ke Shih
2026-06-24 3:39 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
2026-06-24 3:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 04/10] wifi: rtw89: coex: Extend bt_slot_req for dual MAC wifi Ping-Ke Shih
2026-06-24 3:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 05/10] wifi: rtw89: coex: Move Bluetooth related counters to BT info Ping-Ke Shih
2026-06-24 3:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 06/10] wifi: rtw89: coex: Refine third party module related coexistence Ping-Ke Shih
2026-06-24 3:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 07/10] wifi: rtw89: coex: Add TX/RX RF parameter format version 9 Ping-Ke Shih
2026-06-24 3:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 08/10] wifi: rtw89: coex: Renaming drvinfo_type to drvinfo_ver Ping-Ke Shih
2026-06-24 3:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 09/10] wifi: rtw89: coex: Add Wi-Fi firmware 0.35.94.1 support for RTL8922D Ping-Ke Shih
2026-06-24 3:39 ` [PATCH rtw-next 10/10] wifi: rtw89: coex: Add RTL8922D chip string Ping-Ke Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260624033941.45918-4-pkshih@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=ku920601@realtek.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox