From: Maoyi Xie <maoyixie.tju@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Maoyi Xie <maoyixie.tju@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: mac80211: MLO link removal frees link RX stats percpu without RCU grace
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2026 16:01:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260626080158.3589711-1-maoyixie.tju@gmail.com> (raw)
Hi Johannes,
I think there is a use after free on the MLO link removal path in
net/mac80211/sta_info.c. The link RX stats percpu buffer is freed while a
concurrent RX softirq can still write to it. I would appreciate it if you
could take a look.
sta_remove_link() frees the link stats and defers only the container:
sta_info_free_link(&alloc->info);
kfree_rcu(alloc, rcu_head);
sta_info_free_link() does the free right away:
free_percpu(link_sta->pcpu_rx_stats);
So the container waits for a grace period but the percpu stats are
reclaimed at once. The RX fast path runs in softirq under rcu_read_lock
only. It resolves link_sta early and writes the percpu stats later:
stats = this_cpu_ptr(link_sta->pcpu_rx_stats);
stats->last_signal = status->signal;
A reader that resolved link_sta before the removal NULLed it keeps the
pointer. The container is still alive from the kfree_rcu, so the read of
link_sta->pcpu_rx_stats works. But the percpu block it points to is
already freed. This needs uses_rss. That is when pcpu_rx_stats is
allocated. The trigger is an MLO link removed over the air through a
Multi-Link Reconfiguration element.
The full STA teardown does this safely. __sta_info_destroy calls
synchronize_net() before sta_info_free() frees the deflink stats. The MLO
link removal path has no such barrier. That path was added in
cb71f1d136a6 ("wifi: mac80211: add sta link addition/removal").
I do not have WiFi 7 hardware. This is from reading the code. A small test
that frees the stats buffer and writes it through the live container trips
KASAN with a slab use after free.
Does this look like a real use after free to you? Is the right fix to
defer the percpu free to RCU, like the container already is? I am happy to
send a patch once you confirm.
Kaixuan Li and I found this together.
Thanks,
Maoyi
https://maoyixie.com/
next reply other threads:[~2026-06-26 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-26 8:01 Maoyi Xie [this message]
2026-06-26 9:04 ` mac80211: MLO link removal frees link RX stats percpu without RCU grace Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260626080158.3589711-1-maoyixie.tju@gmail.com \
--to=maoyixie.tju@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox