From: Louis Kotze <loukot@gmail.com>
To: johannes@sipsolutions.net
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
loukot@gmail.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] wifi: cfg80211: say why the auth/assoc BSS lookup failed
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 20:11:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260721181158.3004022-1-loukot@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2629d83dd460f3d9a60566f3fad975db13b045c3.camel@sipsolutions.net>
The BSS lookup for an authentication or association request can fail
because no scan entry exists, because the entry is expired, or because
the entry's use_for flags forbid the requested use. All three
currently produce the same generic (or no) diagnostic, which
wpa_supplicant relays verbatim as the only hint a user gets when e.g.
an MLO association degrades to fewer links.
Patch 1 makes __cfg80211_get_bss() record the reason via an optional
extack while it walks the BSS table, and wires the auth and assoc
paths up to it. Patch 2 adds a KUnit test for the reported reasons.
v2: per Johannes' feedback on v1, drop the separate failure-path
classification helper (which re-walked the table and could race
against it changing); the reason is now captured in
__cfg80211_get_bss() itself, during the same bss_lock walk that fails
the lookup, and the public cfg80211_get_bss() wrapper just passes
NULL. Since the reporting now lives in the lookup, the previously
silent authentication path gets the same messages for free, and a
KUnit test (new in v2) can cover all the reasons deterministically.
Demonstrated end-to-end in a mac80211_hwsim VM: with an unpatched
wpa_supplicant failing an MLD reassociation on a stale per-link BSS,
the supplicant log now shows
nl80211: kernel reports: BSS not found in scan results
nl80211: kernel reports error for link: 1
instead of the undiscriminating "Error fetching BSS for link".
Louis Kotze (2):
wifi: cfg80211: say why the auth/assoc BSS lookup failed
wifi: cfg80211: tests: check BSS lookup failure reasons
include/net/cfg80211.h | 7 ++-
net/wireless/nl80211.c | 28 +++++----
net/wireless/scan.c | 35 ++++++++---
net/wireless/tests/scan.c | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
4 files changed, 170 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
base-commit: ac798f757d6475dc6fee2ec899980d6740714596
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-11 4:34 [PATCH] wifi: nl80211: say why the association BSS lookup failed Louis Kotze
2026-07-21 15:31 ` Johannes Berg
2026-07-21 18:11 ` Louis Kotze [this message]
2026-07-21 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] wifi: cfg80211: say why the auth/assoc " Louis Kotze
2026-07-21 22:10 ` Johannes Berg
2026-07-21 18:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] wifi: cfg80211: tests: check BSS lookup failure reasons Louis Kotze
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260721181158.3004022-1-loukot@gmail.com \
--to=loukot@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox