From: Shivesh <chanelshivesh@gmail.com>
To: arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, brcm80211@lists.linux.dev,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Shivesh <shivesh@example.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] wifi: brcmfmac: sdio: coalesce host locks in rx path
Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2026 16:03:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260730160425.11933-2-shivesh@example.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260730160425.11933-1-shivesh@example.com>
Tightens host claim scope to only cover hdparse calls, avoiding
unnecessary blocking during skb manipulation.
Signed-off-by: Shivesh <shivesh@example.com>
---
.../broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 62 ++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
index b725c64e5b5c..4e414403d747 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
@@ -1645,37 +1645,43 @@ static u8 brcmf_sdio_rxglom(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, u8 rxseq)
rd_new.seq_num = rxseq;
rd_new.len = dlen;
+
+ /*
+ * Claim the host once for the entire header-parsing phase.
+ *
+ * brcmf_sdio_hdparse() operates on data already in host
+ * memory, but may call brcmf_sdio_rxfail() on error, which
+ * writes SDIO Func1 registers and therefore requires the
+ * host to be claimed.
+ *
+ * skb_pull() and the num counter are pure host-memory
+ * operations; keep them outside the lock to minimise the
+ * hold time. Both hdparse calls (superframe header and
+ * each subframe header) are grouped under a single claim/
+ * release, replacing the original N+1 separate pairs.
+ */
sdio_claim_host(bus->sdiodev->func1);
errcode = brcmf_sdio_hdparse(bus, pfirst->data, &rd_new,
BRCMF_SDIO_FT_SUPER);
- sdio_release_host(bus->sdiodev->func1);
- bus->cur_read.len = rd_new.len_nxtfrm << 4;
-
- /* Remove superframe header, remember offset */
- skb_pull(pfirst, rd_new.dat_offset);
- num = 0;
-
- /* Validate all the subframe headers */
- skb_queue_walk(&bus->glom, pnext) {
- /* leave when invalid subframe is found */
- if (errcode)
- break;
- rd_new.len = pnext->len;
- rd_new.seq_num = rxseq++;
- sdio_claim_host(bus->sdiodev->func1);
- errcode = brcmf_sdio_hdparse(bus, pnext->data, &rd_new,
- BRCMF_SDIO_FT_SUB);
- sdio_release_host(bus->sdiodev->func1);
- brcmf_dbg_hex_dump(BRCMF_GLOM_ON(),
- pnext->data, 32, "subframe:\n");
-
- num++;
+ /* Validate all the subframe headers while host is claimed */
+ if (!errcode) {
+ skb_queue_walk(&bus->glom, pnext) {
+ rd_new.len = pnext->len;
+ rd_new.seq_num = rxseq++;
+ errcode = brcmf_sdio_hdparse(bus, pnext->data,
+ &rd_new,
+ BRCMF_SDIO_FT_SUB);
+ brcmf_dbg_hex_dump(BRCMF_GLOM_ON(),
+ pnext->data, 32,
+ "subframe:\n");
+ if (errcode)
+ break;
+ }
}
if (errcode) {
- /* Terminate frame on error */
- sdio_claim_host(bus->sdiodev->func1);
+ /* Terminate frame on error, still holding the host */
brcmf_sdio_rxfail(bus, true, false);
bus->sdcnt.rxglomfail++;
brcmf_sdio_free_glom(bus);
@@ -1683,6 +1689,14 @@ static u8 brcmf_sdio_rxglom(struct brcmf_sdio *bus, u8 rxseq)
bus->cur_read.len = 0;
return 0;
}
+ sdio_release_host(bus->sdiodev->func1);
+
+ /* Host released; now do the pure-memory bookkeeping */
+ bus->cur_read.len = rd_new.len_nxtfrm << 4;
+
+ /* Remove superframe header, remember offset */
+ skb_pull(pfirst, rd_new.dat_offset);
+ num = 0;
/* Basic SD framing looks ok - process each packet (header) */
--
2.53.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-30 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-30 16:03 [PATCH 1/8] wifi: brcmfmac: flowring: replace O(N) loop with atomic counter Shivesh
2026-07-30 16:03 ` Shivesh [this message]
2026-07-30 16:03 ` [PATCH 3/8] wifi: brcmfmac: core: populate radiotap header with RSSI Shivesh
2026-07-30 16:03 ` [PATCH 4/8] wifi: brcmfmac: cfg80211: implement PMKID_V2 and fix delay busy-wait Shivesh
2026-07-30 16:03 ` [PATCH 5/8] wifi: brcmfmac: msgbuf: tune thresholds and optimize sleep latency Shivesh
2026-07-30 16:03 ` [PATCH 6/8] wifi: brcmfmac: pcie: optimize latency and irq teardown Shivesh
2026-07-30 16:03 ` [PATCH 7/8] wifi: brcmfmac: fwsignal: safe no-op on duplicate MAC add Shivesh
2026-07-30 16:03 ` [PATCH 8/8] wifi: brcmsmac: ampdu: clarify standard compliance on QoS change Shivesh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260730160425.11933-2-shivesh@example.com \
--to=chanelshivesh@gmail.com \
--cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com \
--cc=brcm80211@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shivesh@example.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox