From: Mehmet Fide <mehmet.fide@gmail.com>
To: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Cc: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Mehmet Fide <mehmet.fide@screeningeagle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rtw-next v3] wifi: rtw88: usb: route bmc frames via the high queue only for DTIM delivery
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2026 08:37:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260814063714.2480456-1-mehmet.fide@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260814053426.2473247-1-mehmet.fide@gmail.com>
From: Mehmet Fide <mehmet.fide@screeningeagle.com>
Hello Ping-Ke,
One more data point that may be useful for the firmware side,
separate from this patch.
While comparing against the vendor driver I noticed a difference in
how MORE_DATA is terminated. rtw88 sets the bit on every high queue
frame (rtw_tx_fill_tx_desc(): more_data = qsel == TX_DESC_QSEL_HIGH),
including the last one. The vendor driver releases the high queue as
an explicit batch and sets mdata = 1 on all frames of the batch
except the final one, which carries 0 (chk_bmc_sleepq_hdl() in
core/rtw_mlme_ext.c of the 88x2bu source).
On both RTL8822BU and RTL8821CU I measured the high queue draining at
roughly 3 frames per DTIM with BIT_TCR_UPDATE_HGQMD set, instead of
the whole buffered burst, so the burst fetch of 076f786a0ae1 does not
seem to engage on these chips. A never-terminated MORE_DATA chain is
my best guess for why, but that is a guess; whether the hardware
needs the 0 to conclude a burst is something only the firmware
documentation can answer.
Thanks,
Mehmet
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-14 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-14 5:34 [PATCH rtw-next v3] wifi: rtw88: usb: route bmc frames via the high queue only for DTIM delivery Mehmet Fide
2026-08-14 6:37 ` Mehmet Fide [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260814063714.2480456-1-mehmet.fide@gmail.com \
--to=mehmet.fide@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mehmet.fide@screeningeagle.com \
--cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox