From: Kamil Bienkiewicz <perceivalpercy@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Johnson <jjohnson@kernel.org>
Cc: Rameshkumar Sundaram <rameshkumar.sundaram@oss.qualcomm.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath12k@lists.infradead.org,
Kamil Bienkiewicz <perceivalpercy@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] wifi: ath12k: advertise AP_VLAN interface mode for IPQ5332
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2026 02:51:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260828005126.1685832-1-perceivalpercy@gmail.com> (raw)
Only the two QCN9274 hw_params advertise NL80211_IFTYPE_AP_VLAN; the
IPQ5332 entry does not. ath12k sets SW_CRYPTO_CONTROL, so mac80211 does
not add the mode on the driver's behalf either -- ieee80211_alloc_hw_nm()
only does that for drivers that leave SW_CRYPTO_CONTROL clear, leaving
the declaration to drivers that can transmit software-encrypted frames.
AP/VLAN is therefore absent from the wiphy, and creating an AP_VLAN
interface without NL80211_ATTR_4ADDR is rejected by
cfg80211_iftype_allowed():
nl80211: Failed to create interface <name>: -95 (Operation not supported)
That is the path hostapd uses for dynamic per-station VLANs, in
hostapd_vlan_if_add(). The 4-address (WDS) case is not affected, as
cfg80211_iftype_allowed() short-circuits it on WIPHY_FLAG_4ADDR_AP,
which mac80211 sets unconditionally at alloc time.
The QCN9274 entries already declare AP_VLAN, and the transmit path is
shared Wi-Fi 7 code with no per-chip or per-bus gating, so IPQ5332 can
deliver it as well. AP_VLAN is a software interface type, so no
interface combination changes are needed.
On a mixed-bus single-wiphy group the effect is wider still, since
ath12k_mac_get_ifmodes() intersects interface_modes across all radios:
one IPQ5332 masks AP_VLAN for the QCN9274 radios too.
Advertise AP_VLAN on IPQ5332 as QCN9274 does. With the mode advertised,
a non-4addr AP_VLAN interface can be created on an AP interface of an
IPQ5332 + 2x QCN9274 single-wiphy group:
# iw dev phy0.0-ap0 interface add tvlan0 type __ap_vlan
# iw dev tvlan0 info
Interface tvlan0
ifindex 19
wdev 0x9
addr 00:03:7f:12:0b:0b
type AP/VLAN
wiphy 0
Radios: 0 1 2
RADIUS-assigned dynamic VLANs were not exercised end to end.
Tested-on: IPQ5332 hw1.0 AHB WLAN.WBE.1.6-01270-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
Tested-on: QCN9274 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.WBE.1.6-01243-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
Signed-off-by: Kamil Bienkiewicz <perceivalpercy@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Rameshkumar Sundaram <rameshkumar.sundaram@oss.qualcomm.com>
---
v3: corrected the rationale. The missing interface_modes bit gates the
non-4addr AP_VLAN path (hostapd dynamic per-station VLANs), not the
4-address WDS interfaces I originally blamed -- those are allowed via
WIPHY_FLAG_4ADDR_AP regardless (thanks Rameshkumar). Added the
interface-creation check on hardware. The diff is unchanged from v2, so
I have kept the Reviewed-by.
v2: rebased onto ath/main (8150c22bc); v1 was generated against a
backports tree and its trailing context no longer matched after
.supports_cong_ctrl_max_msdus was added to the IPQ5332 hw_params entry.
IPQ5424 (and possibly QCC2072/WCN7850) appears to need the same change,
but I have no such hardware, so I have limited this to IPQ5332 which I
could test.
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/wifi7/hw.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/wifi7/hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/wifi7/hw.c
index 7b86f324b..a20c21807 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/wifi7/hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/wifi7/hw.c
@@ -664,7 +664,8 @@ static const struct ath12k_hw_params ath12k_wifi7_hw_params[] = {
.interface_modes = BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_STATION) |
BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_AP) |
- BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT),
+ BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_MESH_POINT) |
+ BIT(NL80211_IFTYPE_AP_VLAN),
.supports_monitor = true,
.supports_cong_ctrl_max_msdus = true,
--
2.55.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-08-28 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-28 0:51 Kamil Bienkiewicz [this message]
2026-09-09 17:57 ` [PATCH v3] wifi: ath12k: advertise AP_VLAN interface mode for IPQ5332 Jeff Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260828005126.1685832-1-perceivalpercy@gmail.com \
--to=perceivalpercy@gmail.com \
--cc=ath12k@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=jjohnson@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rameshkumar.sundaram@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox