From: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
To: "Jeff Johnson" <jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@toke.dk>,
"Kalle Valo" <kvalo@kernel.org>,
"Tetsuo Handa" <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] wifi: ath9k: Clean up device initialisation guards
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2026 19:05:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260908170520.112946-1-toke@redhat.com> (raw)
The ath9k driver has a couple of guards against the RX path running
until device initialisation has completed. However, they are problematic
for several reasons:
- They use smp_wmb() paired with a data_race() annotation, instead of
the idiomatic smb_store_release()/smb_load_acquire() pair.
- The guard in ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet() is weirdly late in the
function.
- There are two of them when there's really no reason the rx init gets
to run before the whole initialisation is complete.
Consolidate the guards on the single ath9k_htc_priv->initialized
variable and use smb_store_release()/smb_load_acquire() to access it.
Move the store into ath9k_init_device() to make sure it's set in all
paths in the driver.
Fixes: 24355fcb0d4c ("wifi: ath9k: delay all of ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet() until init is complete")
Fixes: b0ec7e55fce6 ("ath9k_htc: fix NULL pointer dereference at ath9k_htc_rxep()")
Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h | 1 -
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c | 7 +++----
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_txrx.c | 8 ++------
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c | 12 ++++++------
4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h
index 6c33e898b300..4d2b75d0212e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc.h
@@ -281,7 +281,6 @@ struct ath9k_htc_rxbuf {
struct ath9k_htc_rx {
struct list_head rxbuf;
spinlock_t rxbuflock;
- bool initialized;
};
#define ATH9K_HTC_TX_CLEANUP_INTERVAL 50 /* ms */
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c
index 6de78ae85726..911eaa4f776a 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_init.c
@@ -910,6 +910,9 @@ static int ath9k_init_device(struct ath9k_htc_priv *priv,
ath9k_init_leds(priv);
ath9k_start_rfkill_poll(priv);
+ /* signal completion to ath9k_htc_rxep() and ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet() */
+ smp_store_release(&priv->initialized, true);
+
return 0;
err_world:
@@ -966,10 +969,6 @@ int ath9k_htc_probe_device(struct htc_target *htc_handle, struct device *dev,
htc_handle->drv_priv = priv;
- /* Allow ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet() to operate. */
- smp_wmb();
- priv->initialized = true;
-
return 0;
err_init:
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_txrx.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_txrx.c
index bed7ea2425a0..95f48c7dca15 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_txrx.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/htc_drv_txrx.c
@@ -1141,8 +1141,8 @@ void ath9k_htc_rxep(void *drv_priv, struct sk_buff *skb,
struct ath9k_htc_rxbuf *rxbuf = NULL, *tmp_buf = NULL;
unsigned long flags;
- /* Check if ath9k_rx_init() completed. */
- if (!data_race(priv->rx.initialized))
+ /* Check if ath9k_init_device() completed. */
+ if (!smp_load_acquire(&priv->initialized))
goto err;
spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->rx.rxbuflock, flags);
@@ -1200,10 +1200,6 @@ int ath9k_rx_init(struct ath9k_htc_priv *priv)
list_add_tail(&rxbuf->list, &priv->rx.rxbuf);
}
- /* Allow ath9k_htc_rxep() to operate. */
- smp_wmb();
- priv->rx.initialized = true;
-
return 0;
err:
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c
index 284e8c13b043..44e91815a159 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/wmi.c
@@ -146,6 +146,12 @@ void ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
unsigned long flags;
u16 cmd_id;
+ /* Check if ath9k_init_device() completed. */
+ if (!smp_load_acquire(&priv->initialized)) {
+ tasklet_schedule(t);
+ return;
+ }
+
do {
spin_lock_irqsave(&wmi->wmi_lock, flags);
skb = __skb_dequeue(&wmi->wmi_event_queue);
@@ -155,12 +161,6 @@ void ath9k_wmi_event_tasklet(struct tasklet_struct *t)
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wmi->wmi_lock, flags);
- /* Check if ath9k_htc_probe_device() completed. */
- if (!data_race(priv->initialized)) {
- kfree_skb(skb);
- continue;
- }
-
hdr = (struct wmi_cmd_hdr *) skb->data;
cmd_id = be16_to_cpu(hdr->command_id);
wmi_event = skb_pull(skb, sizeof(struct wmi_cmd_hdr));
--
2.55.0
reply other threads:[~2026-09-08 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260908170520.112946-1-toke@redhat.com \
--to=toke@redhat.com \
--cc=jeff.johnson@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=toke@toke.dk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox