From: Devin Wittmayer <lucid_duck@justthetip.ca>
To: moosager <moosager90@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>
Subject: Re: mt7921e: failure to reset causes network drop
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2026 14:27:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260914212726.15728-1-lucid_duck@justthetip.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aqVwl7fe5zHVYXT9@fedora.fritz.box>
moosager,
Thanks for confirming the ruling-out list, and the Bluetooth detail is
worth having on the thread.
On which tree. Patchwork says accepted, which means a maintainer took it
and says nothing about mainline. That is why you could not find it.
openwrt/mt76 8e856ad93d3a mt7921, applied 27 August
4f2aa9910e0c mt7925, applied 27 August
mainline neither, checked today
Mainline still ignores the return in both of those resets, and I would
not put a date on when that changes.
Your Tested-by went on the mt7921 one.
Devin
On Sat, 12 Sep 2026, moosager wrote:
> Hi Devin,
>
> > On debugging further, I had the same ownership handshake fail on a mini PC
> > here. What that ruled out, so you can skip them: in-tree against out-of-tree
> > builds, a PCI bus reset, remove and rescan, and a cold boot. The Bluetooth
> > half of the same chip kept working throughout, so the silicon was alive and
> > only the WiFi side was stuck.
>
> I can confirm these are the things I've had to rule out with my testing as well.
> I can also attest to the fact that the Bluetooth half of the chip works
> regardless of the Wi-Fi's state (I should've mentioned that earlier): I've used
> my laptop for a while with mt7921e unloaded, all the while Bluetooth was working
> the whole time.
>
> > There is a patch for it that the maintainer has taken
>
> Good, though I don't see which tree it has been merged in, I'm sure I'll see it
> soon in a future release.
>
> > It sits downstream of your bad read though, so it will not stop the
> > register going wrong in the first place.
>
> True, I will stress that the root cause has not been found yet and this chip is
> still unusable for me (and others).
>
> Sorry for the late reply, I'll test the output of lspci as well when I get the
> chance to debug this further.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-14 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-04 10:19 mt7921e: failure to reset causes network drop moosager
2026-09-10 5:50 ` Devin Wittmayer
2026-09-12 15:53 ` moosager
2026-09-14 21:27 ` Devin Wittmayer [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260914212726.15728-1-lucid_duck@justthetip.ca \
--to=lucid_duck@justthetip.ca \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=moosager90@gmail.com \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox