From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <ku920601@realtek.com>, <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Subject: [PATCH rtw-next 2/7] wifi: rtw89: coex: add fbtc_rpt_ctrl v205 report struct and handling
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2026 15:13:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260923071354.50864-3-pkshih@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260923071354.50864-1-pkshih@realtek.com>
From: Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@realtek.com>
Define struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_rpt_ctrl_v205 and add it to the
rtw89_btc_fbtc_rpt_ctrl_ver_info union. Wire up the v205 dispatch
path in _chk_btc_report() including req_len, fver extraction, and
rsp_fver assignment (H2C fver=5). Decode the v205 report block for
rpt_en_map, fw_coex/fw version, cx_offload, build timestamps, gnt_val,
and BT counters. Add fw_ver_match checking for fcxbtcrpt=205, and add
BTTX_HANG detection in the v205 error-check block.
Also add _show_summary_v205() and wire it into the coex info dump so
the fcxbtcrpt=205 statistics block is printed instead of skipped.
Signed-off-by: Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 179 +++++++++++++++++++++-
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h | 14 ++
2 files changed, 191 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
index d3f9ef02e982..0f3347fdbb01 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
@@ -1910,6 +1910,14 @@ static u32 _chk_btc_report(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
fwsubver->fcxbtcrpt = pfwinfo->rpt_ctrl.finfo.v105.fver;
pcinfo->req_fver = 5;
break;
+ } else if (ver->fcxbtcrpt == 205) {
+ pfinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_ctrl.finfo.v205;
+ pcinfo->req_len =
+ sizeof(pfwinfo->rpt_ctrl.finfo.v205);
+ fwsubver->fcxbtcrpt =
+ pfwinfo->rpt_ctrl.finfo.v205.fver;
+ pcinfo->req_fver = 5;
+ break;
} else if (ver->fcxbtcrpt == 8) {
pfinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_ctrl.finfo.v8;
pcinfo->req_len = sizeof(pfwinfo->rpt_ctrl.finfo.v8);
@@ -2304,6 +2312,52 @@ static u32 _chk_btc_report(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
_chk_btc_err(rtwdev, BTC_DCNT_RPT_HANG,
pfwinfo->event[BTF_EVNT_RPT]);
+ dm->error.map.bt_rfk_timeout = bt->rfk_info.map.timeout;
+ } else if (ver->fcxbtcrpt == 205) {
+ prpt->v205 = pfwinfo->rpt_ctrl.finfo.v205;
+ pfwinfo->rpt_en_map =
+ le32_to_cpu(prpt->v205.rpt_info.en);
+ wl->ver_info.fw_coex =
+ le32_to_cpu(prpt->v205.wl_fw_info.cx_ver);
+ wl->ver_info.fw =
+ le32_to_cpu(prpt->v205.wl_fw_info.fw_ver);
+ dm->wl_fw_cx_offload =
+ !!le32_to_cpu(prpt->v205.wl_fw_info.cx_offload);
+
+ memcpy(wl->ver_info.build_time,
+ prpt->v205.build_time,
+ sizeof(wl->ver_info.build_time));
+ memcpy(wl->ver_info.build_date,
+ prpt->v205.build_date,
+ sizeof(wl->ver_info.build_date));
+
+ for (i = RTW89_PHY_0; i < RTW89_PHY_NUM; i++)
+ memcpy(&dm->gnt_val[i],
+ &prpt->v205.gnt_val[i],
+ sizeof(prpt->v205.gnt_val[i]));
+
+ bt->bcnt[BTC_BCNT_HIPRI_TX] =
+ le32_to_cpu(prpt->v205.bt_cnt[BTC_BCNT_HI_TX]);
+ bt->bcnt[BTC_BCNT_HIPRI_RX] =
+ le32_to_cpu(prpt->v205.bt_cnt[BTC_BCNT_HI_RX]);
+ bt->bcnt[BTC_BCNT_LOPRI_TX] =
+ le32_to_cpu(prpt->v205.bt_cnt[BTC_BCNT_LO_TX]);
+ bt->bcnt[BTC_BCNT_LOPRI_RX] =
+ le32_to_cpu(prpt->v205.bt_cnt[BTC_BCNT_LO_RX]);
+ bt->bcnt[BTC_BCNT_POLLUTED] =
+ le32_to_cpu(prpt->v205.bt_cnt[BTC_BCNT_POLLUTED]);
+
+ _chk_btc_err(rtwdev, BTC_DCNT_BTCNT_HANG, 0);
+ _chk_btc_err(rtwdev, BTC_DCNT_RPT_HANG,
+ pfwinfo->event[BTF_EVNT_RPT]);
+ _chk_btc_err(rtwdev, BTC_DCNT_WL_FW_VER_MATCH, 0);
+ _chk_btc_err(rtwdev, BTC_DCNT_BTTX_HANG, 0);
+
+ if (le32_to_cpu(prpt->v205.bt_cnt[BTC_BCNT_RFK_TIMEOUT]) > 0)
+ bt->rfk_info.map.timeout = 1;
+ else
+ bt->rfk_info.map.timeout = 0;
+
dm->error.map.bt_rfk_timeout = bt->rfk_info.map.timeout;
} else if (ver->fcxbtcrpt == 7) {
prpt->v7 = pfwinfo->rpt_ctrl.finfo.v7;
@@ -3332,9 +3386,13 @@ static void rtw89_btc_fw_en_rpt(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
if (btc->ver->fcxbtcrpt == 7 ||
btc->ver->fcxbtcrpt == 8 ||
btc->ver->fcxbtcrpt == 9 ||
- btc->ver->fcxbtcrpt == 11) {
+ btc->ver->fcxbtcrpt == 11 ||
+ btc->ver->fcxbtcrpt == 205) {
r.v8.type = SET_REPORT_EN;
- r.v8.fver = btc->ver->fcxbtcrpt;
+ if (btc->ver->fcxbtcrpt == 205)
+ r.v8.fver = 5;
+ else
+ r.v8.fver = btc->ver->fcxbtcrpt;
r.v8.len = sizeof(r.v8.map);
r.v8.map = cpu_to_le32(rpt_map);
ret = _send_fw_cmd(rtwdev, BTFC_SET, SET_REPORT_EN, &r.v8,
@@ -13644,6 +13702,121 @@ static int _show_summary_v11(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, char *buf, size_t bufsz)
return p - buf;
}
+static int _show_summary_v205(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, char *buf, size_t bufsz)
+{
+ struct rtw89_btc *btc = &rtwdev->btc;
+ struct rtw89_btc_btf_fwinfo *pfwinfo = &btc->fwinfo;
+ struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_rpt_ctrl_v205 *prptctrl;
+ struct rtw89_btc_rpt_cmn_info *pcinfo;
+ struct rtw89_btc_cx *cx = &btc->cx;
+ struct rtw89_btc_dm *dm = &btc->dm;
+ struct rtw89_btc_wl_info *wl = &cx->wl;
+ struct rtw89_btc_bt_info *bt = &cx->bt0;
+ u32 cnt_sum = 0, *cnt = btc->dm.cnt_notify;
+ char *p = buf, *end = buf + bufsz;
+ u8 i;
+
+ if (!(dm->coex_info_map & BTC_COEX_INFO_SUMMARY))
+ return 0;
+
+ p += scnprintf(p, end - p, "========== [Statistics] ==========\n");
+
+ pcinfo = &pfwinfo->rpt_ctrl.cinfo;
+ if (pcinfo->valid && !wl->status.map.lps && !wl->status.map.rf_off) {
+ prptctrl = &pfwinfo->rpt_ctrl.finfo.v205;
+
+ p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
+ " %-15s : h2c_cnt=%d(fail:%d, fw_recv:%d), c2h_cnt=%d(fw_send:%d), ",
+ "[summary]", pfwinfo->cnt_h2c,
+ pfwinfo->cnt_h2c_fail,
+ le32_to_cpu(prptctrl->rpt_info.cnt_h2c),
+ pfwinfo->cnt_c2h,
+ le32_to_cpu(prptctrl->rpt_info.cnt_c2h));
+
+ p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
+ "rpt_cnt=%d(fw_send:%d), rpt_map=0x%x, dm_error_map:0x%x",
+ pfwinfo->event[BTF_EVNT_RPT],
+ le32_to_cpu(prptctrl->rpt_info.cnt),
+ le32_to_cpu(prptctrl->rpt_info.en),
+ dm->error.val);
+
+ if (dm->error.map.wl_fw_hang)
+ p += scnprintf(p, end - p, " (WL FW Hang!!)");
+ p += scnprintf(p, end - p, "\n");
+ p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
+ " %-15s : send_ok:%d, send_fail:%d, recv:%d, ",
+ "[mailbox]",
+ le32_to_cpu(prptctrl->bt_mbx_info.cnt_send_ok),
+ le32_to_cpu(prptctrl->bt_mbx_info.cnt_send_fail),
+ le32_to_cpu(prptctrl->bt_mbx_info.cnt_recv));
+
+ p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
+ "A2DP_empty:%d(stop:%d, tx:%d, ack:%d, nack:%d)\n",
+ le32_to_cpu(prptctrl->bt_mbx_info.a2dp.cnt_empty),
+ le32_to_cpu(prptctrl->bt_mbx_info.a2dp.cnt_flowctrl),
+ le32_to_cpu(prptctrl->bt_mbx_info.a2dp.cnt_tx),
+ le32_to_cpu(prptctrl->bt_mbx_info.a2dp.cnt_ack),
+ le32_to_cpu(prptctrl->bt_mbx_info.a2dp.cnt_nack));
+
+ p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
+ " %-15s : wl_rfk[req:%d/go:%d/reject:%d/timeout:%d]",
+ "[RFK]", wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REQ],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_GO],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_REJECT],
+ wl->wcnt[BTC_WCNT_RFK_TIMEOUT]);
+
+ p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
+ ", bt_rfk[req:%d/go:%d/reject:%d/timeout:%d/fail:%d]\n",
+ le32_to_cpu(prptctrl->bt_cnt[BTC_BCNT_RFK_REQ]),
+ le32_to_cpu(prptctrl->bt_cnt[BTC_BCNT_RFK_GO]),
+ le32_to_cpu(prptctrl->bt_cnt[BTC_BCNT_RFK_REJECT]),
+ le32_to_cpu(prptctrl->bt_cnt[BTC_BCNT_RFK_TIMEOUT]),
+ le32_to_cpu(prptctrl->bt_cnt[BTC_BCNT_RFK_FAIL]));
+
+ if (le32_to_cpu(prptctrl->bt_cnt[BTC_BCNT_RFK_TIMEOUT]) > 0)
+ bt->rfk_info.map.timeout = 1;
+ else
+ bt->rfk_info.map.timeout = 0;
+
+ dm->error.map.wl_rfk_timeout = bt->rfk_info.map.timeout;
+ } else {
+ p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
+ " %-15s : h2c_cnt=%d(fail:%d), c2h_cnt=%d, rpt_cnt=%d, rpt_map=0x%x",
+ "[summary]", pfwinfo->cnt_h2c,
+ pfwinfo->cnt_h2c_fail, pfwinfo->cnt_c2h,
+ pfwinfo->event[BTF_EVNT_RPT],
+ btc->fwinfo.rpt_en_map);
+ p += scnprintf(p, end - p, " (WL FW report invalid!!)\n");
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < BTC_NCNT_NUM; i++)
+ cnt_sum += dm->cnt_notify[i];
+
+ p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
+ " %-15s : total=%d, show_coex_info=%d, power_on=%d, init_coex=%d, ",
+ "[notify_cnt]", cnt_sum, cnt[BTC_NCNT_SHOW_COEX_INFO],
+ cnt[BTC_NCNT_POWER_ON], cnt[BTC_NCNT_INIT_COEX]);
+
+ p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
+ "power_off=%d, radio_state=%d, role_info=%d, wl_rfk=%d, wl_sta=%d\n",
+ cnt[BTC_NCNT_POWER_OFF], cnt[BTC_NCNT_RADIO_STATE],
+ cnt[BTC_NCNT_ROLE_INFO], cnt[BTC_NCNT_WL_RFK],
+ cnt[BTC_NCNT_WL_STA]);
+
+ p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
+ " %-15s : scan_start=%d, scan_finish=%d, switch_band=%d, special_pkt=%d, ",
+ "[notify_cnt]", cnt[BTC_NCNT_SCAN_START],
+ cnt[BTC_NCNT_SCAN_FINISH], cnt[BTC_NCNT_SWITCH_BAND],
+ cnt[BTC_NCNT_SPECIAL_PACKET]);
+
+ p += scnprintf(p, end - p,
+ "timer=%d, control=%d, customerize=%d\n",
+ cnt[BTC_NCNT_TIMER], cnt[BTC_NCNT_CONTROL],
+ cnt[BTC_NCNT_CUSTOMERIZE]);
+
+ return p - buf;
+}
+
ssize_t rtw89_btc_dump_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, char *buf, size_t bufsz)
{
struct rtw89_btc *btc = &rtwdev->btc;
@@ -13704,6 +13877,8 @@ ssize_t rtw89_btc_dump_info(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, char *buf, size_t bufsz)
p += _show_summary_v5(rtwdev, p, end - p);
else if (ver->fcxbtcrpt == 105)
p += _show_summary_v105(rtwdev, p, end - p);
+ else if (ver->fcxbtcrpt == 205)
+ p += _show_summary_v205(rtwdev, p, end - p);
else if (ver->fcxbtcrpt == 7)
p += _show_summary_v7(rtwdev, p, end - p);
else if (ver->fcxbtcrpt == 8)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
index 3a6099386b09..fc51419a1782 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
@@ -3006,6 +3006,19 @@ struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_rpt_ctrl_v11 {
__le32 scbd_b2w[2];
} __packed;
+struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_rpt_ctrl_v205 {
+ u8 fver;
+ u8 rsvd;
+ u8 build_time[RTW89_BTC_TIME_DATE_FMT];
+ u8 build_date[RTW89_BTC_TIME_DATE_FMT];
+ __le16 rsvd1;
+ struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_rpt_ctrl_info rpt_info;
+ struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_rpt_ctrl_wl_fw_info wl_fw_info;
+ struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_rpt_ctrl_bt_mailbox bt_mbx_info;
+ __le32 bt_cnt[BTC_BCNT_STA_MAX];
+ u8 gnt_val[RTW89_PHY_NUM][4];
+} __packed;
+
union rtw89_btc_fbtc_rpt_ctrl_ver_info {
struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_rpt_ctrl_v1 v1;
struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_rpt_ctrl_v4 v4;
@@ -3015,6 +3028,7 @@ union rtw89_btc_fbtc_rpt_ctrl_ver_info {
struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_rpt_ctrl_v8 v8;
struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_rpt_ctrl_v9 v9;
struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_rpt_ctrl_v11 v11;
+ struct rtw89_btc_fbtc_rpt_ctrl_v205 v205;
};
enum rtw89_fbtc_ext_ctrl_type {
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-23 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-23 7:13 [PATCH rtw-next 0/7] wifi: rtw89: coex: update to support newer firmware especially RTL8852C Ping-Ke Shih
2026-09-23 7:13 ` [PATCH rtw-next 1/7] wifi: rtw89: coex: log FCX report version mismatch without dropping Ping-Ke Shih
2026-09-30 2:14 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-09-23 7:13 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
2026-09-23 7:13 ` [PATCH rtw-next 3/7] wifi: rtw89: coex: Add firmware 0.27.130.1 support for RTL8852C Ping-Ke Shih
2026-09-23 7:13 ` [PATCH rtw-next 4/7] wifi: rtw89: coex: fix BT scoreboard update for non-C2H paths Ping-Ke Shih
2026-09-23 7:13 ` [PATCH rtw-next 5/7] wifi: rtw89: add instance of IO ops for (un)pack and [um]delay Ping-Ke Shih
2026-09-23 7:13 ` [PATCH rtw-next 6/7] wifi: rtw89: coex: offload 8852C IO writes via firmware CMD pack region Ping-Ke Shih
2026-09-23 7:13 ` [PATCH rtw-next 7/7] wifi: rtw89: coex: batch PTA init with masked IO offload Ping-Ke Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260923071354.50864-3-pkshih@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=kevin_yang@realtek.com \
--cc=ku920601@realtek.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox