Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <gary.chang@realtek.com>, <echuang@realtek.com>,
	<wenjie.tsai@realtek.com>, <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Subject: [PATCH rtw-next 2/6] wifi: rtw89: pci: fix typo of "deliver"
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2026 14:45:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260930064524.39403-3-pkshih@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260930064524.39403-1-pkshih@realtek.com>

From: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>

The "diliver" should be "deliver", so fix them.

(No logic is changed.)

Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c | 18 +++++++++---------
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.h |  4 ++--
 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c
index 941fb5ca15b6..ddb27c7782a9 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c
@@ -321,10 +321,10 @@ static u32 rtw89_pci_get_rx_skb_idx(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 static u32 rtw89_pci_rxbd_deliver_skbs(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 				       struct rtw89_pci_rx_ring *rx_ring)
 {
-	struct rtw89_rx_desc_info *desc_info = &rx_ring->diliver_desc;
+	struct rtw89_rx_desc_info *desc_info = &rx_ring->deliver_desc;
 	struct rtw89_pci_dma_ring *bd_ring = &rx_ring->bd_ring;
 	const struct rtw89_pci_info *info = rtwdev->pci_info;
-	struct sk_buff *new = rx_ring->diliver_skb;
+	struct sk_buff *new = rx_ring->deliver_skb;
 	struct rtw89_pci_rx_info *rx_info;
 	struct sk_buff *skb;
 	u32 rxinfo_size = sizeof(struct rtw89_pci_rxbd_info);
@@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ static u32 rtw89_pci_rxbd_deliver_skbs(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 		if (!new)
 			goto err_sync_device;
 
-		rx_ring->diliver_skb = new;
+		rx_ring->deliver_skb = new;
 
 		/* first segment has RX desc */
 		offset = desc_info->offset + desc_info->rxd_len;
@@ -392,7 +392,7 @@ static u32 rtw89_pci_rxbd_deliver_skbs(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 	}
 	if (ls) {
 		rtw89_core_rx(rtwdev, desc_info, new);
-		rx_ring->diliver_skb = NULL;
+		rx_ring->deliver_skb = NULL;
 		desc_info->ready = false;
 	}
 
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static u32 rtw89_pci_rxbd_deliver_skbs(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 err_free_resource:
 	if (new)
 		dev_kfree_skb_any(new);
-	rx_ring->diliver_skb = NULL;
+	rx_ring->deliver_skb = NULL;
 	desc_info->ready = false;
 
 	return cnt;
@@ -1840,8 +1840,8 @@ static void rtw89_pci_reset_trx_rings(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev)
 		else
 			bd_ring->wp = 0;
 		bd_ring->rp = 0;
-		rx_ring->diliver_skb = NULL;
-		rx_ring->diliver_desc.ready = false;
+		rx_ring->deliver_skb = NULL;
+		rx_ring->deliver_desc.ready = false;
 		rx_ring->target_rx_tag = 0;
 
 		if (info->group_bd_addr) {
@@ -3719,8 +3719,8 @@ static int rtw89_pci_alloc_rx_ring(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev,
 		rx_ring->bd_ring.wp = 0;
 	rx_ring->bd_ring.rp = 0;
 	rx_ring->buf_sz = buf_sz;
-	rx_ring->diliver_skb = NULL;
-	rx_ring->diliver_desc.ready = false;
+	rx_ring->deliver_skb = NULL;
+	rx_ring->deliver_desc.ready = false;
 	rx_ring->target_rx_tag = 0;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.h
index cba52584ea68..0f9ea4bf54ea 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.h
@@ -1608,8 +1608,8 @@ struct rtw89_pci_rx_ring {
 	struct rtw89_pci_dma_ring bd_ring;
 	struct sk_buff *buf[RTW89_PCI_RXBD_NUM_MAX];
 	u32 buf_sz;
-	struct sk_buff *diliver_skb;
-	struct rtw89_rx_desc_info diliver_desc;
+	struct sk_buff *deliver_skb;
+	struct rtw89_rx_desc_info deliver_desc;
 	u32 target_rx_tag:13;
 };
 
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-30  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-30  6:45 [PATCH rtw-next 0/6] wifi: rtw89: some cleanups and improvements Ping-Ke Shih
2026-09-30  6:45 ` [PATCH rtw-next 1/6] wifi: rtw89: ps: send H2C command related to MLO info when FWIPS Ping-Ke Shih
2026-10-07  3:47   ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-09-30  6:45 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
2026-09-30  6:45 ` [PATCH rtw-next 3/6] wifi: rtw89: rx: refine skb/desc naming to improve readability Ping-Ke Shih
2026-09-30  6:45 ` [PATCH rtw-next 4/6] wifi: rtw89: rx: no need to cancel 6 GHz probe per vif Ping-Ke Shih
2026-09-30  6:45 ` [PATCH rtw-next 5/6] wifi: rtw89: phy: write full data for BB gain table type 15 Ping-Ke Shih
2026-09-30  6:45 ` [PATCH rtw-next 6/6] wifi: rtw89: pack I/O during RF nctl init to reduce execution time Ping-Ke Shih

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260930064524.39403-3-pkshih@realtek.com \
    --to=pkshih@realtek.com \
    --cc=echuang@realtek.com \
    --cc=gary.chang@realtek.com \
    --cc=kevin_yang@realtek.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=wenjie.tsai@realtek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox