From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 00/12] wifi: AP side locking improvements
Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2026 23:40:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261004214504.1636783-14-johannes@sipsolutions.net> (raw)
This obviously goes on top of my (fixed) RTNL redux series.
The idea here is that wiphy mutex can be held for quite a bit
of time (e.g. waiting for firmware), but beacon updates (e.g.
with the critical update design I had proposed a long while
back) and other things should be fast.
So with this not all things require wiphy mutex. These are:
- beacon and related template updates
(this one needs driver opt-in),
- mgmt frame TX,
- control port TX, and
- peer probe.
This does make the implementation slightly more complex, but
the added complexity is almost entirely in mac80211 (and some
in cfg80211), unless a driver wants to opt in to unlocked
beacon/template updates, which it has to implement itself for
obvious reasons.
I think we probably want this even without the critical update
design we're still debating, but I thought I'd throw this out
here because a lot of the discussion has been focused on the
latencies throughout the stack, and I never thought they were
fundamental. QED ;-)
johannes
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-04 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-04 21:40 Johannes Berg [this message]
2026-10-04 21:40 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] wifi: mac80211: protect AP template pointers with a spinlock Johannes Berg
2026-10-04 21:40 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] wifi: nl80211: add NL80211_CMD_UPDATE_BEACON Johannes Berg
2026-10-04 21:40 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] wifi: mac80211: implement lockless beacon updates Johannes Berg
2026-10-09 16:05 ` Johannes Berg
2026-10-04 21:40 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] wifi: mac80211_hwsim: support " Johannes Berg
2026-10-04 21:40 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] wifi: cfg80211: make cookie counter atomic Johannes Berg
2026-10-04 21:40 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] wifi: nl80211: allow mgmt frame TX without wiphy mutex Johannes Berg
2026-10-04 21:40 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] wifi: mac80211: refactor mgmt frames TX Johannes Berg
2026-10-04 21:40 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] wifi: mac80211: implement mgmt_tx_unlocked() Johannes Berg
2026-10-04 21:40 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] wifi: mac80211: don't require wiphy mutex for probe_peer Johannes Berg
2026-10-04 21:40 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] wifi: nl80211: probe peers without wiphy mutex Johannes Berg
2026-10-04 21:40 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] wifi: mac80211: don't require wiphy mutex for control port TX Johannes Berg
2026-10-04 21:40 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] wifi: nl80211: transmit control port frames without wiphy mutex Johannes Berg
2026-10-05 8:43 ` [RFC PATCH 00/12] wifi: AP side locking improvements Johannes Berg
2026-10-06 2:05 ` Jeff Johnson
2026-10-06 7:14 ` Johannes Berg
2026-10-06 7:55 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261004214504.1636783-14-johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--to=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox