From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <ku920601@realtek.com>
Subject: [PATCH rtw-next] wifi: rtw89: coex: fix off-by-one in H2C macro buffer full check
Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2026 13:38:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261005053855.17740-1-pkshih@realtek.com> (raw)
From: Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@realtek.com>
The buffer full check used >=, which rejects a command that would
exactly fill the buffer even though it still fits. Change to > so a
command is only rejected when it would actually overflow hbuf.
Also drop the duplicate BTC_H2C_MAXLENC definition in core.h and keep
BTC_H2C_MAXLEN from coex.h as the single source of truth for the H2C
macro buffer size.
Signed-off-by: Ching-Te Ku <ku920601@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
---
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c | 2 +-
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.h | 1 -
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
index 6b72e2c80d14..19e6decd0761 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.c
@@ -1092,7 +1092,7 @@ static int _send_fw_cmd(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u8 h2c_class, u8 h2c_func,
_reset_h2c_macro(btc);
/* Type:1 byte, Length:2 Bytes, Data:len bytes */
- if (btc->hbuf_len + len + 3 >= BTC_H2C_MAXLEN) {
+ if (btc->hbuf_len + len + 3 > BTC_H2C_MAXLEN) {
rtw89_debug(rtwdev, RTW89_DBG_BTC,
"[BTC], %s():return by MACRO buf full(%d)\n",
__func__, btc->hbuf_len + len + 3);
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.h
index 3e9e1510c44f..38ffd0eff2c3 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/coex.h
@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@
#include "core.h"
-#define BTC_H2C_MAXLEN 2020
#define BTC_TLV_SLOT_ID_LEN_V7 1
#define BTC_SLOT_REQ_TH 2
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
index 7e74b5c9ed49..e31e708e0533 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/core.h
@@ -4434,7 +4434,7 @@ struct rtw89_btc_btf_fwinfo {
};
#define RTW89_BTC_POLICY_MAXLEN 512
-#define BTC_H2C_MAXLENC 2020
+#define BTC_H2C_MAXLEN 2020
struct rtw89_btc {
const struct rtw89_btc_ver *ver;
@@ -4455,7 +4455,7 @@ struct rtw89_btc {
u32 bt_req_len[RTW89_PHY_NUM];
u8 policy[RTW89_BTC_POLICY_MAXLEN];
- u8 hbuf[BTC_H2C_MAXLENC]; /* H2C Macro buffer */
+ u8 hbuf[BTC_H2C_MAXLEN]; /* H2C Macro buffer */
u8 hbuf_cnt; /* H2C cmd count in buffer */
u8 ant_type;
u8 btg_pos;
base-commit: 7cde94dab0e74434ccc0a387d7ad373fb3becda0
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2026-10-05 5:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-05 5:38 Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
2026-10-08 2:23 ` [PATCH rtw-next] wifi: rtw89: coex: fix off-by-one in H2C macro buffer full check Ping-Ke Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261005053855.17740-1-pkshih@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=ku920601@realtek.com \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox