From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@nvidia.com>
Cc: <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com>,
Carolina Jubran <cjubran@nvidia.com>,
Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless v2] wifi: wext: Limit notifier event flushes to the device's netns
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 16:27:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261027162710.34e0e17c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261023081044.728500-1-cratiu@nvidia.com>
On Fri, 23 Oct 2026 11:10:44 +0300 Cosmin Ratiu wrote:
> With mlx5 netdev instance locking enabled, registering an IPoIB netdev
> calls the WEXT notifier while holding the instance mutex. Its call to
> wireless_nlevent_flush() takes net_rwsem to walk every namespace,
> completing the following lockdep dependency cycle:
>
> netdev instance mutex -> net_rwsem (read) -> GID table mutex
> -> event_handler_rwsem (read) -> netdev instance mutex
>
> RoCE GID enumeration takes the GID table mutex under net_rwsem. GID
> updates dispatch events under the table mutex, taking event_handler_rwsem.
> The IPoIB event handler takes the netdev instance mutex in
> ipoib_queue_work() to traverse child interfaces.
>
> The all-namespace walk originated in the single global worker servicing
> per-namespace WEXT queues. The ordering fixes later reused that routine
> in netdevice notifiers to prevent delayed WEXT RTM_NEWLINK messages from
> following RTM_DELLINK or reporting stale interface flags. A notifier only
> needs to drain the affected device's namespace; there is no reason for it
> to walk and flush all namespaces.
>
> Pass dev_net(dev) from both notifier callers and make the flush helper
> operate on that namespace. Keep the all-namespace walk and net_rwsem in
> the existing worker. This removes the instance-mutex -> net_rwsem
> dependency while retaining synchronous flushing from the notifiers.
>
> It may seem strange that the fix for a lock cycle across multiple
> subsystems lies in a completely unrelated part of the code, but this
> seemed the most justified lock cycle edge to break.
If Johannes thinks this scoping is good for other reasons - SGTM.
But my knee jerk fix would be to skip all the wifi processing
for ops-locked devices since no wifi device is ops locked.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 8:10 [PATCH wireless v2] wifi: wext: Limit notifier event flushes to the device's netns Cosmin Ratiu
2026-10-27 23:27 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-10-29 7:01 ` Johannes Berg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261027162710.34e0e17c@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=cjubran@nvidia.com \
--cc=cratiu@nvidia.com \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tariqt@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox