From: Alessio Ferri <alessio.ferri@mythread.it>
To: Luca Casati <luk00casati@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, johannes@sipsolutions.net,
arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com, b43-dev@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-next v2 3/5] b43: N-PHY: fix rev3+ RSSI calibration
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2026 13:00:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261107130051.000038d4@mythread.it> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261106211516.273791-4-luk00casati@gmail.com>
Il giorno Fri, 6 Nov 2026 22:15:14 +0100
Luca Casati <luk00casati@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> Three bugs in b43_nphy_rev3_rssi_cal():
>
> - On rev7+ the selected VCM was written using the loop counter (8
> after the search loop) instead of vcm_final; the 3-bit field turned
> that into VCM 0 on every rev7+ PHY.
> - The distance used I*I + Q*I instead of I*I + Q*Q (brcmsmac
> wlc_phy_rssi_cal_nphy_rev3()).
> - Negative W1/W2 offsets were rounded as -(abs(x + 4) / 8) instead of
> -((abs(x) + 4) / 8).
>
> mmiotraces: https://github.com/Luca00casati/b43patch/blob/755c2d8/traces/excerpts/patch3-rssi-vcm.txt
>
> Found and fixed with the help of an AI coding assistant (Claude Opus
> 5.5), by comparing mmiotraces of b43 and wl on the same card.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Casati <luk00casati@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c
> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c index
> 6b0140f05..36c07d891 100644 ---
> a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c +++
> b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c @@ -2167,7 +2167,7 @@
> static void b43_nphy_rev3_rssi_cal(struct b43_wldev *dev) continue;
> for (vcm = 0; vcm < 8; vcm++) {
> currd = results[vcm][i] *
> results[vcm][i] +
> - results[vcm][i + 1] *
> results[vcm][i];
> + results[vcm][i + 1] *
> results[vcm][i + 1]; if (currd < mind) {
> mind = currd;
> minvcm = vcm;
Ok, in the original there was probably a copy paste error.
> @@ -2184,7 +2184,7 @@ static void b43_nphy_rev3_rssi_cal(struct
> b43_wldev *dev) b43_radio_maskset(dev,
> core ?
> R2057_NB_MASTER_CORE1 : R2057_NB_MASTER_CORE0,
> - ~R2057_VCM_MASK, vcm);
> + ~R2057_VCM_MASK,
> vcm_final); else
> b43_radio_maskset(dev, r |
> B2056_RX_RSSI_MISC, 0xE3, vcm_final << 2);
ok, vcm is clearly wrong, the loop is meant select vcm_final, vcm
simply hold the last loop index.
> @@ -2219,7 +2219,7 @@ static void b43_nphy_rev3_rssi_cal(struct
> b43_wldev *dev) if (j / 2 == core) {
> offset[j] = 232 -
> poll_results[j]; if (offset[j] < 0)
> - offset[j] =
> -(abs(offset[j] + 4) / 8);
> + offset[j] =
> -((abs(offset[j]) + 4) / 8); else
> offset[j] =
> (offset[j] + 4) / 8; b43_nphy_scale_offset_rssi(dev, 0,
Fine
This change the code also for other revs, correct?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-07 12:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-06 21:15 [PATCH wireless-next v2 0/5] b43: N-PHY: fix calibrations on rev7+ (BCM43228) Luca Casati
2026-11-06 21:15 ` [PATCH wireless-next v2 1/5] b43: N-PHY: fix the TX tone sample table Luca Casati
2026-11-06 22:12 ` Alessio Ferri
2026-11-06 21:15 ` [PATCH wireless-next v2 2/5] b43: N-PHY: fix TX IQ/LO calibration Luca Casati
2026-11-06 21:15 ` [PATCH wireless-next v2 3/5] b43: N-PHY: fix rev3+ RSSI calibration Luca Casati
2026-11-07 12:00 ` Alessio Ferri [this message]
2026-11-06 21:15 ` [PATCH wireless-next v2 4/5] b43: N-PHY: use wl's delays in the 2057 RC calibration Luca Casati
2026-11-06 21:15 ` [PATCH wireless-next v2 5/5] b43: N-PHY: add the missing override to the rev7 TX_PU command Luca Casati
2026-11-07 11:48 ` [PATCH wireless-next v2 0/5] b43: N-PHY: fix calibrations on rev7+ (BCM43228) Alessio Ferri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261107130051.000038d4@mythread.it \
--to=alessio.ferri@mythread.it \
--cc=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=b43-dev@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luk00casati@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox