From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from s72.web-hosting.com ([198.187.29.21]:45023 "EHLO s72.web-hosting.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750780Ab3KFFYB (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Nov 2013 00:24:01 -0500 From: Sujith Manoharan MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-ID: <21113.53593.471557.385898@gargle.gargle.HOWL> (sfid-20131106_062407_544518_3629F08E) Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 10:49:21 +0530 To: Dan Carpenter Cc: "John W. Linville" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@venema.h4ckr.net, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch] ath9k: fix SC_OP_INVALID test in ath9k_tx99_init() In-Reply-To: <20131105202034.GC3949@elgon.mountain> References: <20131105202034.GC3949@elgon.mountain> Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Dan Carpenter wrote: > SC_OP_INVALID is zero so the test is always false. We're supposed to be > testing the lowest bit instead. > > Fixes: 89f927af7f33 ('ath9k: add TX99 support') > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c > index 74f452c..7ad4e11 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath9k/main.c > @@ -2456,7 +2456,7 @@ int ath9k_tx99_init(struct ath_softc *sc) > struct ath_tx_control txctl; > int r; > > - if (sc->sc_flags & SC_OP_INVALID) { > + if (test_bit(SC_OP_INVALID, &sc->sc_flags)) { > ath_err(common, > "driver is in invalid state unable to use TX99"); > return -EINVAL; Nice catch. The tx99 code in ath9k has been moved to a separate file, is it okay if I adopt this patch and update it ? Sujith