From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from nbd.name ([46.4.11.11]:57880 "EHLO nbd.name" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725815AbeHYMjB (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Aug 2018 08:39:01 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/17] mt76: rename mt76x2_regs.h To: Stanislaw Gruszka , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi , linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org References: <1535109321-17126-1-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> <1535109321-17126-3-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> From: Felix Fietkau Message-ID: <2172355a-0703-e432-96cb-fba2383c3890@nbd.name> (sfid-20180825_110045_727297_D3340A6C) Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2018 11:00:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1535109321-17126-3-git-send-email-sgruszka@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2018-08-24 13:15, Stanislaw Gruszka wrote: > MAC registers are the same for mt76x0 and mt76x2. Rename mt76x2_regs.h > file to reflect that. > > Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka > --- > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x2.h | 2 +- > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76x2_regs.h | 619 ----------------------- > drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76xx_regs.h | 619 +++++++++++++++++++++++ I think mt76xx_regs.h is named too generic. MT7603, MT7628, MT7615 and all newer chips use a completely different register layout. I'd prefer to stick with mt76x2_regs for now and use it for x0 as well. - Felix