From: Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
To: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: net_device::destructor patch for brcmfmac
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2017 12:07:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <232d7915-f02e-246e-8a98-b0d07346fce5@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871sqctk5l.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
On 22-06-17 12:02, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> writes:
>
>> On Thu, 2017-06-22 at 11:45 +0200, Arend van Spriel wrote:
>>> Hi Kalle,
>>>
>>> I have a fix for brcmfmac, which is related to a change Dave made in
>>> struct net_device, ie. commit cf124db566e6 ("net: Fix inconsistent
>>> teardown and release of private netdev state.").
>
> Is there a report from users or is this more like a theoretical issue?
Well, it a real issue but not reported by users. It only occurs when
register_netdevice() fails which does not happen often enough(?).
> We are quite late in 4.12 cycle so I would prefer to push this via
> wireless-drivers-next and stable tree to 4.12.x, unless it's really
> critical of course.
That was my idea.
>>> This change is not in wireless-drivers-next, but it is in
>>> mac80211-next and thus in wireless-testing. What should I do? Submit
>>> to net-next, or mac80211-next, or will you merge net-next into
>>> wireless-drivers-next?
>>
>> Actually, it's even in *net* I believe, so you should submit it to
>> there, or Kalle should integrate (fast-forward, rebase?) that into
>> wireless-drivers.
>
> My plan is to send a pull request to Dave this week still (unless
> Midsummer celebrations last too long, knowing Finland's weather that's
> unlikely) and I could fast forward then. I have also other patches
> waiting for stuff in net-next.
>
> Arend, I think the best is that you use wireless-testing as baseline and
> clearly document what commit your patch depends on. Once I have fast
> forwarded wireless-drivers-next to latest net-next it _should_ apply
> just fine.
That works for me. Thanks,
Arend
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-22 10:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-22 9:45 net_device::destructor patch for brcmfmac Arend van Spriel
2017-06-22 9:49 ` Johannes Berg
2017-06-22 10:02 ` Kalle Valo
2017-06-22 10:07 ` Arend van Spriel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=232d7915-f02e-246e-8a98-b0d07346fce5@broadcom.com \
--to=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).