linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hin-Tak Leung <htl10@users.sourceforge.net>
To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@mandriva.com.br>
Cc: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
	John W Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	Michael Wu <flamingice@sourmilk.net>,
	Andrea Merello <andrea.merello@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/2] rtl8187: feedback transmitted packets using tx close descriptor for 8187B
Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2008 20:27:12 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <244535.27936.qm@web23107.mail.ird.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1225806649-10050-3-git-send-email-herton@mandriva.com.br>

--- On Tue, 4/11/08, Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton@mandriva.com.br> wrote:

> Realtek 8187B has a receive command queue to feedback beacon
> interrupt
> and transmitted packet status. Use it to feedback mac80211
> about status
> of transmitted packets. Unfortunately in the course of
> testing I found
> that the sequence number reported by hardware includes
> entire sequence
> control in a 12 bit only field, so a workaround is done to
> check only
> lowest bits.

> ---
>  v2: fix rate stuck at 1M reported by Larry Finger, Hin-Tak
> and also seen by me.
>      btw, I noted now with a ralink device that rt2500usb
> (rt2x00) has same
>      issue currently.


> -		hdr->retry =
> cpu_to_le32((info->control.rates[0].count - 1) <<
> 8);
> +		hdr->retry =
> cpu_to_le32(info->control.rates[0].count << 8);

> -		hdr->retry =
> cpu_to_le32((info->control.rates[0].count - 1) <<
> 8);
> +		hdr->retry =
> cpu_to_le32(info->control.rates[0].count << 8);

These are the only lines which changed between the two versions of the patch - if removing the two -1's fixes the rate stuck (and these two lines are newly introduced), shouldn't this be a separate commit if it fixes a problem introduced by an earlier commit?

I did *not* (and do not) have a rate-stuck problem, but I am running a slightly mod version of the patch against 2.6.27, which doesn't have "rates[x].count" yet, with the retry_count struct member which seems to have since been removed.


      

  reply	other threads:[~2008-11-04 20:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-11-04 13:50 [RFC/RFT PATCH 0/2 v2] rtl8187: implement conf_tx callback/correctly ack tx pkts Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2008-11-04 13:50 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 1/2] rtl8187: implement conf_tx callback to configure tx queues Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2008-11-04 22:30   ` Larry Finger
2008-11-04 23:11     ` Felix Fietkau
2008-11-05 15:33       ` Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2008-11-04 13:50 ` [RFC/RFT PATCH v2 2/2] rtl8187: feedback transmitted packets using tx close descriptor for 8187B Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2008-11-04 20:27   ` Hin-Tak Leung [this message]
2008-11-04 21:30     ` Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2008-11-04 22:31   ` Larry Finger
2008-11-05 11:29     ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-05 15:38       ` Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2008-11-05 15:40         ` Johannes Berg
2008-11-05 15:59           ` Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-05  2:02 Hin-Tak Leung
2008-11-05 15:42 ` Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2008-11-05 17:11   ` Hin-Tak Leung
2008-11-05 21:36     ` Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
2008-11-05 22:05       ` Hin-Tak Leung
2008-11-05 22:43         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-11-05 23:16           ` Hin-Tak Leung
2008-11-05 23:35             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-11-06 14:14             ` John W. Linville
2008-11-06 18:53               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-11-06  0:00       ` Hin-Tak Leung
2008-11-06  0:18         ` Larry Finger
2008-11-06  1:02           ` Hin-Tak Leung
2008-11-06  1:36           ` Hin-Tak Leung
2008-11-06  1:42             ` Larry Finger
2008-11-06  4:23               ` Hin-Tak Leung
2008-11-06 20:49               ` Hin-Tak Leung

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=244535.27936.qm@web23107.mail.ird.yahoo.com \
    --to=htl10@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=andrea.merello@gmail.com \
    --cc=flamingice@sourmilk.net \
    --cc=herton@mandriva.com.br \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).