From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: do not call driver wake_tx_queue op during reconfig
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 09:21:34 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <27da2e1d-9086-2329-e2fc-fc4b0cdd13af@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3bc506d5-8432-56d4-8588-afe7dea2eba3@nbd.name>
On 3/1/19 8:13 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2019-03-01 17:06, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2019-03-01 16:29, Ben Greear wrote:
>>> On 3/1/19 5:48 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>>> There are several scenarios in which mac80211 can call drv_wake_tx_queue
>>>> after ieee80211_restart_hw has been called and has not yet completed.
>>>> Driver private structs are considered uninitialized until mac80211 has
>>>> uploaded the vifs, stations and keys again, so using private tx queue
>>>> data during that time is not safe.
>>>>
>>>> The driver can also not rely on drv_reconfig_complete to figure out when
>>>> it is safe to accept drv_wake_tx_queue calls again, because it is only
>>>> called after all tx queues are woken again.
>>>>
>>>> To fix this, bail out early in drv_wake_tx_queue if local->in_reconfig
>>>> is set.
>>>
>>> This reminded me of a patch I posted back in 2016. The discussion just sort of
>>> ended on it, but curious if you have a new opinion on it after debugging the
>>> issue in this patch:
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9457709/
>>>
>>> For what its worth, I've been using the patch above since I posted it, and
>>> it seems to work well for ath9k and ath10k.
>> I agree with what Johannes wrote about that patch. Fixing this could
>> likely be as simple as clearing IEEE80211_SDATA_IN_DRIVER on all
>> interfaces before bringing any of them back up. That way the normal
>> interface add logic applies without nasty special cases.
>> The reconfig code checks for ieee80211_sdata_running (which is
>> unaffected), so I don't think we need to save the previous value of that
>> flag.
> How about this? (untested)
> ---
> --- a/net/mac80211/util.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/util.c
> @@ -1956,7 +1956,6 @@ static void ieee80211_flush_completed_scan(struct ieee80211_local *local,
>
> static void ieee80211_handle_reconfig_failure(struct ieee80211_local *local)
> {
> - struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata;
> struct ieee80211_chanctx *ctx;
>
> /*
> @@ -1980,9 +1979,6 @@ static void ieee80211_handle_reconfig_failure(struct ieee80211_local *local)
> */
> ieee80211_sched_scan_end(local);
>
> - list_for_each_entry(sdata, &local->interfaces, list)
> - sdata->flags &= ~IEEE80211_SDATA_IN_DRIVER;
> -
> /* Mark channel contexts as not being in the driver any more to avoid
> * removing them from the driver during the shutdown process...
> */
> @@ -2135,6 +2131,9 @@ int ieee80211_reconfig(struct ieee80211_local *local)
>
> local->started = false;
>
> + list_for_each_entry(sdata, &local->interfaces, list)
> + sdata->flags &= ~IEEE80211_SDATA_IN_DRIVER;
> +
> /*
> * Upon resume hardware can sometimes be goofy due to
> * various platform / driver / bus issues, so restarting
>
Let me see if anyone (Johannes?) has comments on this... I can test it out
a bit later if no one suggests changes.
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-01 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-01 13:48 [PATCH] mac80211: do not call driver wake_tx_queue op during reconfig Felix Fietkau
2019-03-01 15:29 ` Ben Greear
2019-03-01 16:06 ` Felix Fietkau
2019-03-01 16:13 ` Felix Fietkau
2019-03-01 17:21 ` Ben Greear [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=27da2e1d-9086-2329-e2fc-fc4b0cdd13af@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nbd@nbd.name \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox