Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mac80211: do not call driver wake_tx_queue op during reconfig
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2019 09:21:34 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <27da2e1d-9086-2329-e2fc-fc4b0cdd13af@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3bc506d5-8432-56d4-8588-afe7dea2eba3@nbd.name>

On 3/1/19 8:13 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
> On 2019-03-01 17:06, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>> On 2019-03-01 16:29, Ben Greear wrote:
>>> On 3/1/19 5:48 AM, Felix Fietkau wrote:
>>>> There are several scenarios in which mac80211 can call drv_wake_tx_queue
>>>> after ieee80211_restart_hw has been called and has not yet completed.
>>>> Driver private structs are considered uninitialized until mac80211 has
>>>> uploaded the vifs, stations and keys again, so using private tx queue
>>>> data during that time is not safe.
>>>>
>>>> The driver can also not rely on drv_reconfig_complete to figure out when
>>>> it is safe to accept drv_wake_tx_queue calls again, because it is only
>>>> called after all tx queues are woken again.
>>>>
>>>> To fix this, bail out early in drv_wake_tx_queue if local->in_reconfig
>>>> is set.
>>>
>>> This reminded me of a patch I posted back in 2016.  The discussion just sort of
>>> ended on it, but curious if you have a new opinion on it after debugging the
>>> issue in this patch:
>>>
>>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9457709/
>>>
>>> For what its worth, I've been using the patch above since I posted it, and
>>> it seems to work well for ath9k and ath10k.
>> I agree with what Johannes wrote about that patch. Fixing this could
>> likely be as simple as clearing IEEE80211_SDATA_IN_DRIVER on all
>> interfaces before bringing any of them back up. That way the normal
>> interface add logic applies without nasty special cases.
>> The reconfig code checks for ieee80211_sdata_running (which is
>> unaffected), so I don't think we need to save the previous value of that
>> flag.
> How about this? (untested)
> ---
> --- a/net/mac80211/util.c
> +++ b/net/mac80211/util.c
> @@ -1956,7 +1956,6 @@ static void ieee80211_flush_completed_scan(struct ieee80211_local *local,
>   
>   static void ieee80211_handle_reconfig_failure(struct ieee80211_local *local)
>   {
> -	struct ieee80211_sub_if_data *sdata;
>   	struct ieee80211_chanctx *ctx;
>   
>   	/*
> @@ -1980,9 +1979,6 @@ static void ieee80211_handle_reconfig_failure(struct ieee80211_local *local)
>   	 */
>   	ieee80211_sched_scan_end(local);
>   
> -	list_for_each_entry(sdata, &local->interfaces, list)
> -		sdata->flags &= ~IEEE80211_SDATA_IN_DRIVER;
> -
>   	/* Mark channel contexts as not being in the driver any more to avoid
>   	 * removing them from the driver during the shutdown process...
>   	 */
> @@ -2135,6 +2131,9 @@ int ieee80211_reconfig(struct ieee80211_local *local)
>   
>   	local->started = false;
>   
> +	list_for_each_entry(sdata, &local->interfaces, list)
> +		sdata->flags &= ~IEEE80211_SDATA_IN_DRIVER;
> +
>   	/*
>   	 * Upon resume hardware can sometimes be goofy due to
>   	 * various platform / driver / bus issues, so restarting
> 

Let me see if anyone (Johannes?) has comments on this...  I can test it out
a bit later if no one suggests changes.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


      reply	other threads:[~2019-03-01 17:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-01 13:48 [PATCH] mac80211: do not call driver wake_tx_queue op during reconfig Felix Fietkau
2019-03-01 15:29 ` Ben Greear
2019-03-01 16:06   ` Felix Fietkau
2019-03-01 16:13     ` Felix Fietkau
2019-03-01 17:21       ` Ben Greear [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=27da2e1d-9086-2329-e2fc-fc4b0cdd13af@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox