From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: Christian Hewitt <christianshewitt@gmail.com>
Cc: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] wifi: rtw89: retry efuse physical map dump on transient failure
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 03:05:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ab692371ff94a3f960d41b04288a084@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CC1F2CDA-830F-4351-A855-8C921B148F8D@gmail.com>
Christian Hewitt <christianshewitt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 9 Mar 2026, at 6:35 am, Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote:
> >
> > Christian Hewitt <christianshewitt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> On 2 Mar 2026, at 10:04 am, Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Christian Hewitt <christianshewitt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On 2 Mar 2026, at 9:47 am, Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Christian Hewitt <christianshewitt@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Radxa Rock 5B with a RTL8852BE combo WiFi/BT card, the efuse
> >>>>>> physical map dump intermittently fails with -EBUSY during probe.
> >>>>>> The failure occurs in rtw89_dump_physical_efuse_map_ddv() where
> >>>>>> read_poll_timeout_atomic() times out waiting for the B_AX_EF_RDY
> >>>>>> bit after 1 second.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm checking internally how we handle this case.
> >
> > Sorry for the late.
> >
> > We encountered WiFi/BT reading efuse at the same time causing similar
> > problem as yours. The workaround is like yours, which adds timeout
> > time.
> >
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [...]
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For context, firmware also fails (and recovers) sometimes:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Did you mean this doesn't always happen? sometimes?
> >>>>
> >>>> It’s another intermittent behaviour observed on this board (and not
> >>>> related to the issue this patch targets). It occurs less frequently
> >>>> than the efuse issue and the existing retry mechanism in the driver
> >>>> ensures firmware load always succeeds.
> >
> > This might be the same cause due to reading efuse in firmware.
> >
> > Though we can add more timeout and retry times as workaround, I wonder
> > if you can control loading time of WiFi and BT kernel modules?
> >
> > More, can you do experiment that you load BT module first, and then load
> > WiFi module after 10 seconds (choose a large number intentionally, or
> > even larger)?
>
> https://paste.libreelec.tv/charmed-turkey.sh
>
> I’ve run the above script ^ which removes the wifi and bt modules in
> sequence then reloads them in the reverse order with a delay between
> bt and wifi modules loading, then checks for error messages. Over 200
> test cycles with a 10s delay all were clean (no errors). I also ran
> cycles with a 2 second delay and 0 second delay before starting wifi
> module load and those were clear too. I guess that proves sequencing
> avoids the efuse contention issue? - although it’s not possible in
> the real-world so not sure there’s huge value in knowing that :)
Thanks for the experiments.
Still want to know is it possible to change sequence/time of loading
kernel modules at boot time from system level? I mean can you adjust
the sequence in the Rock 5B board?
In addition, did below messages not appear in these experiments?
[ 7.864148] rtw89_8852be 0002:21:00.0: fw security fail
[ 7.864154] rtw89_8852be 0002:21:00.0: download firmware fail
Ping-Ke
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-11 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-01 4:24 [PATCH] wifi: rtw89: retry efuse physical map dump on transient failure Christian Hewitt
2026-03-02 5:47 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-02 5:55 ` Christian Hewitt
2026-03-02 6:04 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-02 6:17 ` Christian Hewitt
2026-03-09 2:35 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-10 17:16 ` Christian Hewitt
2026-03-11 3:05 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
2026-03-11 4:20 ` Christian Hewitt
2026-03-12 2:22 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-12 5:58 ` Christian Hewitt
2026-03-12 7:39 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-12 8:11 ` Christian Hewitt
2026-03-12 8:28 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-16 5:32 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-16 11:03 ` Christian Hewitt
2026-03-17 1:37 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2026-03-17 6:15 ` Christian Hewitt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2ab692371ff94a3f960d41b04288a084@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=christianshewitt@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox