From: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@gmail.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
"linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC] rtw88: Fix startup problems for SDIO wifi plus UART Bluetooth
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 04:25:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2afb5edcf8bf4173ab339e54707ada0b@realtek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <287e9d4e-316a-4579-961e-58e75abea534@lwfinger.net>
Larry Finger <larry.finger@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 4/10/24 9:13 PM, Ping-Ke Shih wrote:
> >
> > Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> + mdelay(500);
> >
> > Will it better to use sleep function?
>
> My thoughts were that a sleep function would tie up a CPU, whereas the delay
> would not. Initially, we tested an msleep(150) statement, but that only gave a
> 60% success rate, whereas mdelay(500) worked 20 straight tries.
>
Sorry, I didn't consider the experimental results of msleep(150) and mdelay(500).
My point was busy waiting of mdelay(). I just want to say if msleep(500) is
better than mdelay(500).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-11 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-11 1:26 [RFC] rtw88: Fix startup problems for SDIO wifi plus UART Bluetooth Larry Finger
2024-04-11 2:13 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2024-04-11 2:47 ` Larry Finger
2024-04-11 4:25 ` Ping-Ke Shih [this message]
2024-04-11 7:08 ` Kalle Valo
2024-04-11 17:28 ` Larry Finger
2024-04-15 0:45 ` Ping-Ke Shih
2024-04-15 1:23 ` Larry Finger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2afb5edcf8bf4173ab339e54707ada0b@realtek.com \
--to=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@gmail.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=kvalo@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox