From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084CFC433E1 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:56:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02F222CAE for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 12:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729064AbgH0Msh (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:48:37 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:42136 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729165AbgH0Msa (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Aug 2020 08:48:30 -0400 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:191:4433::2]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F067DC061264 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 05:48:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1kBHKF-00BarU-A5; Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:48:19 +0200 Message-ID: <2e2961bfa154f49f177f234e8a6727dd5a5433ce.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/13] mac80211 encapsulation offload / performance patches From: Johannes Berg To: Felix Fietkau , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 14:48:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20200821084926.10650-1-nbd@nbd.name> References: <20200821084926.10650-1-nbd@nbd.name> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.5 (3.36.5-1.fc32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org The rest actually look fine. I do wonder if with these changes we could map fast-rx into the offload case, and unify all the "offload recalc" and "fast-rx recalc"? johannes