linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesse Jones <jjones@cococorp.com>
To: Yeoh Chun-Yeow <yeohchunyeow@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] mac80211: mesh - don't special case routing to transmitter
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2015 13:13:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <330c0318174057b4aab778c1e5190fbe@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAEFj9877azQTokwHAgg2-rn8Y5j41+5dW3BVAJpJwhwx2u4NRA@mail.gmail.com>

> > There are two test scenarios:
> > 1) When creating the path to a ta where the direct hop is a bad path.
> > Relatively easy to setup and demonstrate poor performance pre-patch.
> > 2) Incorrect routing when the metric for an existing SN is changed
> > without also updating the SN. Hard to demonstrate. We've certainly
> > seen similar bugs with our own mesh protocols but that was with
> > protocols explicitly designed with testing support. Best approach is
> > probably via something like http://alloy.mit.edu/alloy/
>
> If the direct hop is a bad path, could it be due the metric calculation.

Sure, metric calculations are not perfect. But that is an entirely separate
can of worms. For the purposes of this discussion we can assume that the
metrics are perfect. Simplest case is the one I mentioned before: a U where
we're trying to route between the ends of the U but the direct hop is bad
and the links along the U are excellent.

> Also, you may also add your vendor specific mesh protocol to open source
> community.

Maybe. We spent many man years on it and eventually got it routing well. It
was all done in a commercial setting though so I don't know that we would
open source it.

  -- Jesse

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-26 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-25  1:55 [PATCH] mac80211: mesh - don't special case routing to transmitter Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2015-06-25 19:35 ` Jesse Jones
2015-06-26  1:32 ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2015-06-26  1:52   ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2015-06-26 19:15     ` Jesse Jones
2015-06-26 19:46       ` Yeoh Chun-Yeow
2015-06-26 20:13         ` Jesse Jones [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-06-17 17:04 Alexis Green

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=330c0318174057b4aab778c1e5190fbe@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jjones@cococorp.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yeohchunyeow@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).