From: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Chaoming_Li <chaoming_li@realsil.com.cn>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] rtlwifi: avoid accessing RCR directly
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 22:46:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3888493.2VXzEtRsP2@al> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52FE8A8C.6040407@lwfinger.net>
On Friday 14 February 2014 15:28:44 Larry Finger wrote:
> On 02/14/2014 12:03 PM, Peter Wu wrote:
> > The rtl*_set_check_bssid functions are mostly the same, but access the
> > RCR register in different ways. Use the get_hw_reg abstraction layer
> > (which reads rtlpci->receive_config for PCI devices and mac->rx_conf for
> > USB).
> >
> > There is no functional change for cases where receive_config was
> > accessed directly. For rtl8192ce, there is still no change because
> > nothing modifies REG_RCR or receive_config. For rtl8192cu, it now also
> > applies changes to rx_conf from configure_filter, but that can be
> > considered a bug which is fixed later.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com>
>
> Acked-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger>
TLD is missing ;)
> With this change it will not take much work to move all the
> *_set_check_bssid functions into a common version in rtlwifi. But that
> will have to wait as I have one new driver submitted, but not merged, and
> two others that are not quite ready for submission.
There are three variants of the set_check_bssid functions:
- four that modify the beacon filter (through _rtl*_set_bcn_ctrl_reg)
- one (rtl8192se) that does not modify the beacon filter and writes
less bits (just RCR_BSSID instead of RCR_BSSID_{DATA,BCN})
- one (rtl8192cu) that modifies the beacon filter, and depending on
the chip version, sets the same bits as rtl8192se, or the other four.
I was not sure where to move the set_bcn_ctrl_reg functions, these
depend on a value from rtl*/reg.h. Perhaps the [gs]et_hw_reg functions
can be extended with these registers?
Thanks,
Peter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-14 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-14 18:03 [PATCH 0/3] rtlwifi promiscious mode fix and cleanup Peter Wu
2014-02-14 18:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] rtlwifi: avoid accessing RCR directly Peter Wu
2014-02-14 21:28 ` Larry Finger
2014-02-14 21:46 ` Peter Wu [this message]
2014-02-14 18:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] rtlwifi: properly apply filter flags Peter Wu
2014-02-14 21:32 ` Larry Finger
2014-02-14 18:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] rtlwifi: remove unused allow_all_destaddr functions Peter Wu
2014-02-14 21:38 ` Larry Finger
2014-02-14 21:48 ` Peter Wu
2014-02-14 21:57 ` Larry Finger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3888493.2VXzEtRsP2@al \
--to=lekensteyn@gmail.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=chaoming_li@realsil.com.cn \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).