linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
	"John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Cc: Chaoming_Li <chaoming_li@realsil.com.cn>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] rtlwifi: avoid accessing RCR directly
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 22:46:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3888493.2VXzEtRsP2@al> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52FE8A8C.6040407@lwfinger.net>

On Friday 14 February 2014 15:28:44 Larry Finger wrote:
> On 02/14/2014 12:03 PM, Peter Wu wrote:
> > The rtl*_set_check_bssid functions are mostly the same, but access the
> > RCR register in different ways. Use the get_hw_reg abstraction layer
> > (which reads rtlpci->receive_config for PCI devices and mac->rx_conf for
> > USB).
> > 
> > There is no functional change for cases where receive_config was
> > accessed directly. For rtl8192ce, there is still no change because
> > nothing modifies REG_RCR or receive_config. For rtl8192cu, it now also
> > applies changes to rx_conf from configure_filter, but that can be
> > considered a bug which is fixed later.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Wu <lekensteyn@gmail.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger>

TLD is missing ;)

> With this change it will not take much work to move all the
> *_set_check_bssid  functions into a common version in rtlwifi. But that
> will have to wait as I have one new driver submitted, but not merged, and
> two others that are not quite ready for submission.

There are three variants of the set_check_bssid functions:
- four that modify the beacon filter (through _rtl*_set_bcn_ctrl_reg)
- one (rtl8192se) that does not modify the beacon filter and writes
  less bits (just RCR_BSSID instead of RCR_BSSID_{DATA,BCN})
- one (rtl8192cu) that modifies the beacon filter, and depending on
  the chip version, sets the same bits as rtl8192se, or the other four.

I was not sure where to move the set_bcn_ctrl_reg functions, these
depend on a value from rtl*/reg.h. Perhaps the [gs]et_hw_reg functions
can be extended with these registers?

Thanks,
Peter


  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-14 21:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-14 18:03 [PATCH 0/3] rtlwifi promiscious mode fix and cleanup Peter Wu
2014-02-14 18:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] rtlwifi: avoid accessing RCR directly Peter Wu
2014-02-14 21:28   ` Larry Finger
2014-02-14 21:46     ` Peter Wu [this message]
2014-02-14 18:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] rtlwifi: properly apply filter flags Peter Wu
2014-02-14 21:32   ` Larry Finger
2014-02-14 18:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] rtlwifi: remove unused allow_all_destaddr functions Peter Wu
2014-02-14 21:38   ` Larry Finger
2014-02-14 21:48     ` Peter Wu
2014-02-14 21:57       ` Larry Finger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3888493.2VXzEtRsP2@al \
    --to=lekensteyn@gmail.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=chaoming_li@realsil.com.cn \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).