From: "Luka Gejak" <luka.gejak@linux.dev>
To: "Bitterblue Smith" <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Ping-Ke Shih" <pkshih@realtek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rtw-next 3/5] wifi: rtw88: pci: Introduce struct rtw_pci_gen
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2026 08:41:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3a8cd96e14c643837676fcee1d85c720b54f5377@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc308de1-a470-4890-a86a-d8936e093bd5@gmail.com>
October 24, 2026 at 1:01 AM, "Bitterblue Smith" <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Move a few functions into a new struct rtw_pci_gen in order to add
> support for RTL8821AE and RTL8812AE. That is an older generation of
> chips which handle the PCI communications differently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bitterblue Smith <rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com>
> ---
> [...]
> rx_ring->r.head = head;
> + rx_ring->r.dma = dma;
> + rx_ring->r.len = len;
> + rx_ring->r.desc_size = desc_size;
> + rx_ring->r.wp = 0;
> + rx_ring->r.rp = 0;
In my opinion the commit message should mention why these were moved
before the loop.
[...]
> {
> + struct rtw_pci *rtwpci = (struct rtw_pci *)rtwdev->priv;
> + const struct rtw_pci_gen *pci_gen = rtwpci->gen;
> +
> u8 q;
The blank line before u8 q can go, so the declarations stay together.
[...]
> int rtw_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> const struct pci_device_id *id)
> {
> + struct rtw_pci_info *pci_info = (struct rtw_pci_info *)id->driver_data;
I think this should be a const pointer, since the pci_info tables are
const.
Best regards,
Luka Gejak
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-24 8:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 22:57 [PATCH rtw-next 0/5] wifi: rtw88: pci: Support an older design, like RTL8821AE/RTL8812AE Bitterblue Smith
2026-10-23 22:59 ` [PATCH rtw-next 1/5] wifi: rtw88: Pass RX buffer to rtw_rx_query_rx_desc() Bitterblue Smith
2026-10-23 23:00 ` [PATCH rtw-next 2/5] wifi: rtw88: Pass TX descriptor to rtw_tx_fill_tx_desc() Bitterblue Smith
2026-10-23 23:01 ` [PATCH rtw-next 3/5] wifi: rtw88: pci: Introduce struct rtw_pci_gen Bitterblue Smith
2026-10-24 8:41 ` Luka Gejak [this message]
2026-10-23 23:02 ` [PATCH rtw-next 4/5] wifi: rtw88: pci: Add functions to support older chips Bitterblue Smith
2026-10-24 8:36 ` Luka Gejak
2026-10-23 23:05 ` [PATCH rtw-next 5/5] wifi: rtw88: pci: Handle more RX interrupts for RTL8821AE Bitterblue Smith
2026-10-27 1:52 ` [PATCH rtw-next 0/5] wifi: rtw88: pci: Support an older design, like RTL8821AE/RTL8812AE Ping-Ke Shih
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3a8cd96e14c643837676fcee1d85c720b54f5377@linux.dev \
--to=luka.gejak@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pkshih@realtek.com \
--cc=rtl8821cerfe2@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox