From: Arend Van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com>
To: "Rafał Miłecki" <zajec5@gmail.com>, "Kalle Valo" <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "Franky Lin" <franky.lin@broadcom.com>,
"Hante Meuleman" <hante.meuleman@broadcom.com>,
"Pieter-Paul Giesberts" <pieter-paul.giesberts@broadcom.com>,
"Franky Lin" <frankyl@broadcom.com>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com,
"Rafał Miłecki" <rafal@milecki.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.12 2/2] brcmfmac: use more accurate PCIe chip names in fw table
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 14:28:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3cc84a21-9ef9-e28c-454e-ddd60ab4921e@broadcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170224122739.1778-2-zajec5@gmail.com>
On 24-2-2017 13:27, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
>
> Many chips have few variants/versions, e.g. BCM4366 can be 4366b1 or
> 4366c0. Cutting name at the letter isn't a good idea as sometimes we may
> have e.g. a0 and a1.
As explained in 1/2, the revision may change but if rom image is
unchanged the firmware stays compatible. As predicting chip development
is impossible initially we choose a common name as entry ID. So if there
would come a 4366c1 with incompatible rom image it would be time to
change the entry ID.
Regards,
Arend
> This is just a cosmetic change, a trivial cleanup. It obviously doesn't
> change fw filenames as we don't want to break user space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@milecki.pl>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c
> index 2a171479b42b..7039f7f09653 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/pcie.c
> @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ enum brcmf_pcie_state {
> BRCMFMAC_PCIE_STATE_UP
> };
>
> -BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_DEF(43602, "brcmfmac43602-pcie.bin", "brcmfmac43602-pcie.txt");
> +BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_DEF(43602a1, "brcmfmac43602-pcie.bin", "brcmfmac43602-pcie.txt");
> BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_DEF(4350, "brcmfmac4350-pcie.bin", "brcmfmac4350-pcie.txt");
> BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_DEF(4350C, "brcmfmac4350c2-pcie.bin", "brcmfmac4350c2-pcie.txt");
> BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_DEF(4356, "brcmfmac4356-pcie.bin", "brcmfmac4356-pcie.txt");
> @@ -55,13 +55,13 @@ BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_DEF(4358, "brcmfmac4358-pcie.bin", "brcmfmac4358-pcie.txt");
> BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_DEF(4359, "brcmfmac4359-pcie.bin", "brcmfmac4359-pcie.txt");
> BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_DEF(4365B, "brcmfmac4365b-pcie.bin", "brcmfmac4365b-pcie.txt");
> BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_DEF(4365C, "brcmfmac4365c-pcie.bin", "brcmfmac4365c-pcie.txt");
> -BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_DEF(4366B, "brcmfmac4366b-pcie.bin", "brcmfmac4366b-pcie.txt");
> -BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_DEF(4366C, "brcmfmac4366c-pcie.bin", "brcmfmac4366c-pcie.txt");
> +BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_DEF(4366b1, "brcmfmac4366b-pcie.bin", "brcmfmac4366b-pcie.txt");
> +BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_DEF(4366c0, "brcmfmac4366c-pcie.bin", "brcmfmac4366c-pcie.txt");
> BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_DEF(4371, "brcmfmac4371-pcie.bin", "brcmfmac4371-pcie.txt");
>
> static struct brcmf_firmware_mapping brcmf_pcie_fwnames[] = {
> - BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_ENTRY(BRCM_CC_43602_CHIP_ID, 0xFFFFFFFE, 43602),
> - BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_ENTRY(BRCM_CC_43465_CHIP_ID, 0xFFFFFFF0, 4366C),
> + BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_ENTRY(BRCM_CC_43602_CHIP_ID, 0xFFFFFFFE, 43602a1),
> + BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_ENTRY(BRCM_CC_43465_CHIP_ID, 0xFFFFFFF0, 4366c0),
> BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_ENTRY(BRCM_CC_4350_CHIP_ID, 0x000000FF, 4350C),
> BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_ENTRY(BRCM_CC_4350_CHIP_ID, 0xFFFFFF00, 4350),
> BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_ENTRY(BRCM_CC_43525_CHIP_ID, 0xFFFFFFF0, 4365C),
> @@ -73,8 +73,8 @@ static struct brcmf_firmware_mapping brcmf_pcie_fwnames[] = {
> BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_ENTRY(BRCM_CC_4359_CHIP_ID, 0xFFFFFFFF, 4359),
> BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_ENTRY(BRCM_CC_4365_CHIP_ID, 0x0000000F, 4365B),
> BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_ENTRY(BRCM_CC_4365_CHIP_ID, 0xFFFFFFF0, 4365C),
> - BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_ENTRY(BRCM_CC_4366_CHIP_ID, 0x0000000F, 4366B),
> - BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_ENTRY(BRCM_CC_4366_CHIP_ID, 0xFFFFFFF0, 4366C),
> + BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_ENTRY(BRCM_CC_4366_CHIP_ID, 0x0000000F, 4366b1),
> + BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_ENTRY(BRCM_CC_4366_CHIP_ID, 0xFFFFFFF0, 4366c0),
> BRCMF_FW_NVRAM_ENTRY(BRCM_CC_4371_CHIP_ID, 0xFFFFFFFF, 4371),
> };
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-02-24 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-24 12:27 [PATCH 4.12 1/2] brcmfmac: don't use 43602a1 firmware for 43602a0 chipset Rafał Miłecki
2017-02-24 12:27 ` [PATCH 4.12 2/2] brcmfmac: use more accurate PCIe chip names in fw table Rafał Miłecki
2017-02-24 13:28 ` Arend Van Spriel [this message]
2017-02-24 13:21 ` [PATCH 4.12 1/2] brcmfmac: don't use 43602a1 firmware for 43602a0 chipset Arend Van Spriel
2017-02-24 13:43 ` Rafał Miłecki
2017-02-28 9:23 ` Arend Van Spriel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3cc84a21-9ef9-e28c-454e-ddd60ab4921e@broadcom.com \
--to=arend.vanspriel@broadcom.com \
--cc=brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com \
--cc=franky.lin@broadcom.com \
--cc=frankyl@broadcom.com \
--cc=hante.meuleman@broadcom.com \
--cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pieter-paul.giesberts@broadcom.com \
--cc=rafal@milecki.pl \
--cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox