From: James Prestwood <prestwoj@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Association comeback delay behavior
Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 06:07:06 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e4dd1d6-2eee-43c0-a9f9-9fdca5eda866@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17ba3b94c5c5ced1d77ad457beedb57b0815820d.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Hi,
On 5/23/25 5:57 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> From a user-experience point of view I think most people watching their
>> device trying to connect for more than about 20-30 seconds is going to
>> trigger a "wtf, this is broken" response. And I know if my router was
>> taking that long to accept connections it would be promptly rebooted.
>> Its a long way of saying that I think there is some reasonable value here.
> We don't just implement wifi for laptops though. I mean we, Intel, do,
> but generally the stack gets used elsewhere. The random IOT device out
> in my garage? I don't really care where it waits, it only gets a single
> BSSID it could ever use.
Yeah the use-case is important. And for mine where connectivity/uptime
is very critical even a 1 second comeback delay is too long and I would
want the device to roam/connect elsewhere, which then leads back to
CMD_ASSOC_COMEBACK.
So no matter what I'll need that event, I was mainly trying to figure
out why the kernel let these excessive wait times happen. I don't have
an answer as to where the cutoff would be though, so I guess I'll drop
it for now.
Thanks,
James
>
> johannes
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-23 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-22 17:45 Association comeback delay behavior James Prestwood
2025-05-23 11:59 ` Johannes Berg
2025-05-23 12:28 ` James Prestwood
2025-05-23 12:34 ` Johannes Berg
2025-05-23 12:54 ` James Prestwood
2025-05-23 12:57 ` Johannes Berg
2025-05-23 13:07 ` James Prestwood [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3e4dd1d6-2eee-43c0-a9f9-9fdca5eda866@gmail.com \
--to=prestwoj@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox