Linux wireless drivers development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jonas Dreßler" <verdre@v0yd.nl>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Cc: "Amitkumar Karwar" <amitkarwar@gmail.com>,
	"Ganapathi Bhat" <ganapathi017@gmail.com>,
	"Xinming Hu" <huxinming820@gmail.com>,
	"Kalle Valo" <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Johan Hedberg" <johan.hedberg@gmail.com>,
	"Luiz Augusto von Dentz" <luiz.dentz@gmail.com>,
	"Tsuchiya Yuto" <kitakar@gmail.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Maximilian Luz" <luzmaximilian@gmail.com>,
	"Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	"Pali Rohár" <pali@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Bluetooth: btusb: Lower passive lescan interval on Marvell 88W8897
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 14:41:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3e5b7e27-e643-ae9b-db40-d885ca441385@v0yd.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B9F09991-0B67-4848-86DE-C13BF3850D15@holtmann.org>

On 9/17/21 2:35 PM, Marcel Holtmann wrote:
> Hi Jonas,
> 
>> The Marvell 88W8897 combined wifi and bluetooth card (pcie+usb version)
>> is used in a lot of Microsoft Surface devices, and all those devices
>> suffer from very low 2.4GHz wifi connection speeds while bluetooth is
>> enabled. The reason for that is that the default passive scanning
>> interval for Bluetooth Low Energy devices is quite high on Linux
>> (interval of 60 msec and scan window of 30 msec, see le_scan_interval
>> and le_scan_window in hci_core.c), and the Marvell chip is known for its
>> bad bt+wifi coexisting performance.
>>
>> So decrease that passive scan interval and make the scan window shorter
>> on this particular device to allow for spending more time transmitting
>> wifi signals: The new scan interval is 250 msec (0x190 * 0.625 msec) and
>> the new scan window is 6.25 msec (0xa * 0.625 msec).
>>
>> This change has a very large impact on the 2.4GHz wifi speeds and gets
>> it up to performance comparable with the Windows driver, which seems to
>> apply a similar quirk.
>>
>> The scan interval and scan window length were tested and found to work
>> very well with a bunch of Bluetooth Low Energy devices, including the
>> Surface Pen, a Bluetooth Speaker and two modern Bluetooth headphones.
>> All devices were discovered immediately after turning them on. Even
>> lower values were also tested, but these introduced longer delays until
>> devices get discovered.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jonas Dreßler <verdre@v0yd.nl>
>> ---
>> drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> index 60d2fce59a71..05b11179c839 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btusb.c
>> @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ static struct usb_driver btusb_driver;
>> #define BTUSB_WIDEBAND_SPEECH	0x400000
>> #define BTUSB_VALID_LE_STATES   0x800000
>> #define BTUSB_QCA_WCN6855	0x1000000
>> +#define BTUSB_LOWER_LESCAN_INTERVAL	0x2000000
>> #define BTUSB_INTEL_BROKEN_INITIAL_NCMD 0x4000000
>>
>> static const struct usb_device_id btusb_table[] = {
>> @@ -356,6 +357,7 @@ static const struct usb_device_id blacklist_table[] = {
>> 	{ USB_DEVICE(0x1286, 0x2044), .driver_info = BTUSB_MARVELL },
>> 	{ USB_DEVICE(0x1286, 0x2046), .driver_info = BTUSB_MARVELL },
>> 	{ USB_DEVICE(0x1286, 0x204e), .driver_info = BTUSB_MARVELL },
>> +	{ USB_DEVICE(0x1286, 0x204c), .driver_info = BTUSB_LOWER_LESCAN_INTERVAL },
>>
>> 	/* Intel Bluetooth devices */
>> 	{ USB_DEVICE(0x8087, 0x0025), .driver_info = BTUSB_INTEL_COMBINED },
>> @@ -3813,6 +3815,19 @@ static int btusb_probe(struct usb_interface *intf,
>> 	if (id->driver_info & BTUSB_MARVELL)
>> 		hdev->set_bdaddr = btusb_set_bdaddr_marvell;
>>
>> +	/* The Marvell 88W8897 combined wifi and bluetooth card is known for
>> +	 * very bad bt+wifi coexisting performance.
>> +	 *
>> +	 * Decrease the passive BT Low Energy scan interval a bit
>> +	 * (0x0190 * 0.625 msec = 250 msec) and make the scan window shorter
>> +	 * (0x000a * 0,625 msec = 6.25 msec). This allows for significantly
>> +	 * higher wifi throughput while passively scanning for BT LE devices.
>> +	 */
>> +	if (id->driver_info & BTUSB_LOWER_LESCAN_INTERVAL) {
>> +		hdev->le_scan_interval = 0x0190;
>> +		hdev->le_scan_window = 0x000a;
>> +	}
>> +
> 
> you can not do it this way. Modifying hci_dev internals from within the driver is not acceptable.
> 
> Regards
> 
> Marcel
> 

Hi Marcel,

hmm okay, it seems to me that the intention of your commit 
bef64738e3fb87eabc6fbeededad0c44ea173384 was to allow configuring it on 
a per controller basis, also btusb changes a bunch of other hci_dev 
properties? Given that we also have to match by usb-id, I don't think 
there's another place to do that other than the usb driver, or is there?

Jonas

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-17 12:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-17 12:27 [PATCH] Bluetooth: btusb: Lower passive lescan interval on Marvell 88W8897 Jonas Dreßler
2021-09-17 12:30 ` Pali Rohár
2021-09-17 12:36   ` Jonas Dreßler
2021-09-17 12:35 ` Marcel Holtmann
2021-09-17 12:41   ` Jonas Dreßler [this message]
2021-09-17 13:18     ` Marcel Holtmann
2021-09-17 13:32       ` Jonas Dreßler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3e5b7e27-e643-ae9b-db40-d885ca441385@v0yd.nl \
    --to=verdre@v0yd.nl \
    --cc=amitkarwar@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ganapathi017@gmail.com \
    --cc=huxinming820@gmail.com \
    --cc=johan.hedberg@gmail.com \
    --cc=kitakar@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luiz.dentz@gmail.com \
    --cc=luzmaximilian@gmail.com \
    --cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
    --cc=pali@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox