linux-wireless.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>
To: "Christian Lamparter" <chunkeey@web.de>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org,
	"John W Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>,
	"Larry Finger" <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
	"Johannes Berg" <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"Pavel Roskin" <proski@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] p54: AP & Ad-hoc testing
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2008 16:27:34 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43e72e890810161627vaa0d8ebq1ca2d2428e3fffa8@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200810170117.07236.chunkeey@web.de>

On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:17 PM, Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de> wrote:
> With this patch one can finally test Ad-hoc & AP mode.
> The station unlocking should work now, so the card doesn't have
> to be rebooted anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Lamparter <chunkeey@web.de>

Nice, BTW besides ad-hoc what other stuff does prism54 support that
p54 doesn't? Also have you had any reports of users not being able to
use p54 over prism54?

I ask because I'd like to rm -rf prism54, specially if no distribution
is carrying it around anymore and if it has no users. Other
considerations against removing it before was that p54 wasn't feature
paired with prism54. I am wondering if this is still the case.

  Luis

  reply	other threads:[~2008-10-16 23:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-10-16 23:17 [PATCH 3/3] p54: AP & Ad-hoc testing Christian Lamparter
2008-10-16 23:27 ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2008-10-17  1:55   ` [PATCH 3/3 v2] " Christian Lamparter
2008-10-18 21:19     ` [PATCH 3/3 v3] " Christian Lamparter
2008-10-22 21:20       ` John W. Linville

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43e72e890810161627vaa0d8ebq1ca2d2428e3fffa8@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=mcgrof@gmail.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=chunkeey@web.de \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=proski@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).