From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.30]:40046 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750742AbZBLPx7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:53:59 -0500 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 5so394564ywh.1 for ; Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:53:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <17a838c40902120456wb862200y8717a0d6a061b057@mail.gmail.com> References: <2d14e2ca0902110900r7f0b84e4k7be81827187c434@mail.gmail.com> <43e72e890902111341l36bd40c8o9d54515e8b06e603@mail.gmail.com> <17a838c40902120456wb862200y8717a0d6a061b057@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 07:53:57 -0800 Message-ID: <43e72e890902120753w44cab825i861d5c92c4816c61@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20090212_165403_667927_4703D2D6) Subject: Re: [ath9k-devel] Radar Detection and DFS status From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Alberto Pollastro Cc: Michael Green , ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 4:56 AM, Alberto Pollastro wrote: > On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: >> >> mac80211 or ath9k does not yet have radar detection support so >> therefore no mac80211 driver will allow you to use any beaconing mode >> (AP | IBSS | Mesh) mode on DFS channels yet. >> >> Note that not all 5 GHz channels require radar detection though so you >> could try using one of the non-DFS channels. Check 'iw list' for that. > > I've checked in regdb (2009.01.30) an it reports that I can use these > frequencies (in Italy): > > country IT: > (2402 - 2482 @ 40), (N/A, 20) > (5170 - 5250 @ 40), (N/A, 20) > (5250 - 5330 @ 40), (N/A, 20), DFS > (5490 - 5710 @ 40), (N/A, 27), DFS > > I'm not sure, but in Italy the range 5170 - 5250 can be used only > indoor. Are indoor/outdoor channels treated differently by mac80211 > and/or ath9k? Yes, we have indoor and outdoor channel flags. You can supply a patch or provide a reference to the regulatory information you are reading to determine this and we can patch it up. > Regarding 802.11h, is its development for beaconing modes scheduled? I believe this will be worked on but we have no exact schedule. Luis