public inbox for linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@atheros.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] cfg80211: move regulatory hints to workqueue
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2009 00:19:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <43e72e890902130019y3c7106ecqffcc68e53df8514b@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1234512529.1327.38.camel@johannes.local>

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Johannes Berg
<johannes@sipsolutions.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 23:57 -0800, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>
>> To answer that question -- reg_mutex just protects the
>> reg_requests_list linked list. That's it. Without that you could
>> potentially have two userspace reg hints while the workqueue runs.
>> Remember that the hints no longer lock except to just add a new
>> regulatory_request into the reg_requests_list.
>
> Right, ok.
>
>> >> Driver hint also does the same so it seems your fix on nl80211 would
>> >> probably just tap this series on the nl80211_req_set_reg().
>> >
>> > Yeah, I think I'll work on top of your series anyway so I don't clash
>> > with the cleanups.
>>
>> Any other comments on the series?
>
> Not really, looks pretty good to me. It does seem a little dubious to
> return an error from a hint function and then not attach the hardware,
> but that's up to you what you want to do in ath9k I guess -- seems it
> should work ok even if the hint failed, though of course then you'll not
> have memory for anything else either...

The only error is -ENOMEM so yeah we certainly should propagate that
down to the driver. An alternative is to use a few regulatory_requests
on the stack for queuing purposes but it just seemed silly on second
thought.

  Luis

  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-13  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-13  5:35 [PATCH 0/6] cfg80211: adds a workqueue for regulatory hints Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-13  5:35 ` [PATCH 1/6] cfg80211: rename cfg80211_registered_device's idx to wiphy_idx Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-13  5:35   ` [PATCH 2/6] cfg80211: add wiphy_idx_valid to check for wiphy_idx sanity Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-13  5:36     ` [PATCH 3/6] cfg80211: rename cfg80211_drv_mutex to cfg80211_mutex Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-13  5:36       ` [PATCH 4/6] cfg80211: add assert_cfg80211_lock() to ensure proper protection Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-13  5:36         ` [PATCH 5/6] cfg80211: make regulatory_request use wiphy_idx instead of wiphy Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-13  5:36           ` [PATCH 6/6] cfg80211: move regulatory hints to workqueue Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-13  6:56             ` Johannes Berg
2009-02-13  7:09               ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-13  7:14                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-13  7:14                   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-13  7:17                     ` Johannes Berg
2009-02-13  7:35                       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-13  7:48                         ` Johannes Berg
2009-02-13  7:57                           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-13  8:08                             ` Johannes Berg
2009-02-13  8:19                               ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2009-02-13 11:04           ` [PATCH 5/6] cfg80211: make regulatory_request use wiphy_idx instead of wiphy Johannes Berg
2009-02-13 18:21             ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-13 21:24               ` Johannes Berg
2009-02-13 21:40                 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-13  6:54         ` [PATCH 4/6] cfg80211: add assert_cfg80211_lock() to ensure proper protection Johannes Berg
2009-02-13  7:08           ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-13  6:53     ` [PATCH 2/6] cfg80211: add wiphy_idx_valid to check for wiphy_idx sanity Johannes Berg
2009-02-13  7:08       ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2009-02-13  7:18         ` Johannes Berg
2009-02-13  9:13 ` [PATCH 0/6] cfg80211: adds a workqueue for regulatory hints Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=43e72e890902130019y3c7106ecqffcc68e53df8514b@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=lrodriguez@atheros.com \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox