From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ew0-f165.google.com ([209.85.219.165]:48724 "EHLO mail-ew0-f165.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762797AbZCXQNk (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:13:40 -0400 Received: by ewy9 with SMTP id 9so2148611ewy.37 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:13:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1237883293.6278.9.camel@johannes.local> References: <20090323162834.154525349@sipsolutions.net> <1237883293.6278.9.camel@johannes.local> Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:13:21 -0700 Message-ID: <43e72e890903240913iee51dcbnfa2409e01d4dd5c0@mail.gmail.com> (sfid-20090324_171347_567018_159914E9) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] mac80211 aggregation improvements From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Johannes Berg Cc: John Linville , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Johannes Berg wrote: > On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 17:28 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote: > >> Here's my patch set for improving aggregation > > John, can I convince you to put this on track for .30 despite being > posted just hours before the merge window officially opened? The reason > I'm asking is that otherwise I'll have to support two code bases with > rather different ways to have aggregation working for iwlwifi again, > with different sets of bugs and different ways to fix it. This patch set > has also been tested fairly extensively already [1] inside Intel for > iwlwifi hardware and by Sujith for ath9k (and myself for both). It is not accurate to say Sujith has extensively tested this for ath9k, he probably just ran it a few times. So I cannot say we are as comfortable with the patches as you or Intel seem to be already. Luis