From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-iw0-f178.google.com ([209.85.223.178]:48898 "EHLO mail-iw0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753161AbZIKBuq (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:50:46 -0400 Received: by iwn8 with SMTP id 8so298576iwn.4 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:50:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:50:29 -0700 Message-ID: <43e72e890909101850i4ceecd77j6e43668cdbd4aa25@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Testing of pending patches for ath, ath5k, ath9k, ar9170 To: linux-wireless , devel@linuxdriverproject.org, ath9k-devel@lists.ath9k.org, ath5k-devel@lists.ath5k.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I've posted my series of patches so far as PATCH form as I feel confident about them, but it always helps to get early testers. If you have ath5k, ath9k, or ar9170 hardware please give these a whirl on top of wireless-testing. Nothing much has changed except a lot of code shuffling and the start of hw code sharing. I'm curious if any user on real single CPU boxen notices any differences, I would doubt it, but hey, lets see. http://bombadil.infradead.org/~mcgrof/patches/ath/2009/09/all-2009-09-10.patch After this I guess there's just a few tiny places to address on hw related code to ensure ath_softc is not used, once this is all cleaned up we can start using the code as-is on ath9k_htc. Luis