From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.117]:38685 "EHLO mtiwmhc13.worldnet.att.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030477AbXBLXSq (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:18:46 -0500 Message-ID: <45D0F5D4.3070305@lwfinger.net> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 17:18:44 -0600 From: Larry Finger MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" CC: wireless , bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de, Michael Buesch , John Linville Subject: Re: [PATCH] bcm43xx: Fix loss of association after resume References: <45cc9ebb.+9O/IXvs/C9RyFnk%Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net> <200702122148.58101.rjw@sisk.pl> <45D0E834.4050800@lwfinger.net> <200702130008.47684.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: <200702130008.47684.rjw@sisk.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, 12 February 2007 23:20, Larry Finger wrote: >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>> On Monday, 12 February 2007 02:18, Larry Finger wrote: >>>> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>>>> It doesn't help in my case. The behavior is similar to that without the patch, >>>>> but also with the patch it loses the association entirely. >>>> Thanks for trying. >>>> >>>> Do you have this patch installed? If you do, please try increasing the 100 to 200. >>> Hm, but it wouldn't help to get the microcode to respond after the resume ... >> Yes it would. That count is how long the system waits for the firmware to respond. >> >>> I'm still thinking the problem is with the firmware. Where exactly is it >>> stored? >> In the memory of the microprocessor on the card. >> >> Please do what I asked. > > With or without the previous patch? With the change to BCM43xx_IRQWAIT_MAX_RETRIES, but not the one that tries to reload the firmware. Larry